Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139997›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2021

Moral distress and ethical climate in intensive care medicine during COVID-19: a nationwide study.

Moniek A Donkers, Vincent J H S Gilissen, Math J J M Candel, Nathalie M van Dijk, Hans Kling, Ruth Heijnen-Panis, Elien Pragt, Iwan van der Horst, Sebastiaan A Pronk, Walther N K A van Mook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
43.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Moniek A Donkers *Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.donkers@student.maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Vincent J H S Gilissen *Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Math J J M CandelDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nathalie M van DijkDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hans KlingDepartment of Spiritual Care Services, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ruth Heijnen-PanisDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Elien PragtDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Iwan van der HorstDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan A PronkDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Walther N K A van MookDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has created ethical challenges for intensive care unit (ICU) professionals, potentially causing moral distress. This study explored the levels and causes of moral distress and the ethical climate in Dutch ICUs during COVID-19.

methodsAn extended version of the Measurement of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) and Ethical Decision Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) were online distributed among all 84 ICUs. Moral distress scores in nurses and intensivists were compared with the historical control group one year before COVID-19.

resultsThree hundred forty-five nurses (70.7%), 40 intensivists (8.2%), and 103 supporting staff (21.1%) completed the survey. Moral distress levels were higher for nurses than supporting staff. Moral distress levels in intensivists did not differ significantly from those of nurses and supporting staff. "Inadequate emotional support for patients and their families" was the highest-ranked cause of moral distress for all groups of professionals. Of all factors, all professions rated the ethical climate most positively regarding the culture of mutual respect,  ethical awareness and support. "Culture of not avoiding end-of-life-decisions" and "Self-reflective and empowering leadership" received the lowest mean scores. Moral distress scores during COVID-19 were significantly lower for ICU nurses (p < 0.001) and intensivists (p < 0.05) compared to one year prior.

conclusionLevels and causes of moral distress vary between ICU professionals and differ from the historical control group. Targeted interventions that address moral distress during a crisis are desirable to improve the mental health and retention of ICU professionals and the quality of patient care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsMoralsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesCoronavirusCOVID-19DoctorsEthical climateIntensive care medicineIntensivistsMoral distressNurses

Identifiers

PMID34139997
PMCPMC8211309
OpenAlexW3168570673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.