Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139995›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Hand hygiene during facility-based childbirth in Cambodia: a theory-driven, mixed-methods observational study.

Yolisa Nalule, Helen Buxton, Por Ir, Supheap Leang, Alison Macintyre, Ponnary Pors, Channa Samol, Robert Dreibelbis

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yolisa NaluleDisease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Yolisa.Nalule@lshtm.ac.uk.
Helen BuxtonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, W1T 7BN, UK.
Por IrNational Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Supheap LeangNational Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Alison MacintyreWaterAid Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Ponnary PorsWaterAid Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Channa SamolWaterAid Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Robert DreibelbisDisease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Documentation Center of Cambodia · KHNational Institute of Public Health · KHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite current efforts to improve hand hygiene in health care facilities, compliance among birth attendants remains low. Current improvement strategies are inadequate, largely focusing on a limited set of known behavioural determinants or addressing hand hygiene as part of a generalized set of hygiene behaviours. To inform the design of a facility -based hand hygiene behaviour change intervention in Kampong Chhnang, Cambodia, a theory-driven formative research study was conducted to investigate the context specific behaviours and determinants of handwashing during labour and delivery among birth attendants.

methodsThis formative mixed-methods research followed a sequential explanatory design and was conducted across eight healthcare facilities. The hand hygiene practices of all birth attendants present during the labour and delivery of 45 women were directly observed and compliance with hand hygiene protocols assessed in analysis. Semi-structured, interactive interviews were subsequently conducted with 20 key healthcare workers to explore the corresponding cognitive, emotional, and environmental drivers of hand hygiene behaviours.

resultsBirth attendants' compliance with hand hygiene protocol was 18% prior to performing labour, delivery and newborn aftercare procedures. Hand hygiene compliance did not differ by facility type or attendants' qualification, but differed by shift with adequate hand hygiene less likely to be observed during the night shift (p = 0.03). The midwives' hand hygiene practices were influenced by cognitive, psychological, environmental and contextual factors including habits, gloving norms, time, workload, inadequate knowledge and infection risk perception.

conclusionThe resulting insights from formative research suggest a multi-component improvement intervention that addresses the different key behaviour determinants to be designed for the labour and delivery room. A combination of disruption of the physical environment via nudges and cues, participatory education to the midwives and the promotion of new norms using social influence and affiliation may increase the birth attendants' hand hygiene compliance in our study settings.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesHealth PersonnelMidwiferyParturitionAdultCambodiaCross InfectionDelivery RoomsFemaleGloves, ProtectiveHand DisinfectionHand HygieneHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyFormative researchHand hygieneInfection prevention and controlIntervention designMaternal infection

Identifiers

PMID34139995
PMCPMC8212449
OpenAlexW3131719499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.