Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139992›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

Ecological strategies of biological and chemical control agents on wildfire disease of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.).

Tianbo Liu, Yabing Gu, Zhicheng Zhou, Zhenghua Liu, Huaqun Yin, Chong Qin, Tuyong Yi, Jiemeng Tao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tianbo Liu *College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Yabing Gu *School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhicheng ZhouCentral South Agricultural Experiment Station of China Tobacco, Changsha, China.
Zhenghua LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Huaqun YinSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chong QinSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Tuyong YiCollege of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China. yituyong@hunau.net.
Jiemeng TaoChina Tobacco Gene Research Center, Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute of CNTC, Zhengzhou, China. taojiemeng@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CNChina Tobacco · CNHunan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the ecological effects of chemical and biological control methods on tobacco wildfire disease, a plot field experiment was conducted to compare the control efficiency and mechanisms of a chemical pesticide (kasugamycin wettable powder, KWP) and a biological control agent (BCA) through high-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.

resultsThe results showed that the BCA displayed better performance in decreasing the disease index and morbidity of tobacco than the chemical pesticide. By monitoring the endophytic community within tobacco leaves, it was found that the control effects of these two methods might be mediated by different changes in the endophytic bacterial communities and community assembly patterns. The application of either method decreased the taxonomic diversity of the leaf endophytic community. Compared to the BCA, KWP showed a more significant effect on the endophytic community structure, while the endophytic community treated with the BCA was able to return to the original state, which presented much lower disease infection. The disease control efficiency of KWP and BCA treatments might be achieved by increasing the abundance of Sphingomonas and Streptophyta, respectively. Furthermore, an analysis of the ecological processes in community assembly indicated that the BCA strengthened the homogeneous and variable selection, while KWP enhanced ecological drift.

conclusionsThe results suggested different control mechanisms between KWP and BCA treatments, which will help in developing diverse ecological strategies for plant disease control.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesBacteriaBiological Control AgentsNicotianaPlant DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAminoglycosidesBiological Control AgentskasugamycinRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiological control agentCommunity assemblyEcological processEndophytic bacterial community

Identifiers

PMID34139992
PMCPMC8212473
OpenAlexW3169762576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.