ReviewActa orthopaedica2021
The rise of registry-based research: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Acta orthopaedica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reliability of artificial intelligence in predicting total knee arthroplasty component sizes: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Pooled it
- Implant breakage after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of data from worldwide arthroplasty registries and clinical trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Use of the National Trauma Data Bank in orthopaedic trauma research: a bibliometric analysis.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2026Article
- Preliminary Quadriceps Muscle Contraction in the Early Rehabilitation of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Developing a Classification of Spinal Medical Devices: Has the Time Come? Review of the Literature and a Proposal for Spine Registries.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of indications for selectively missing results in comparative registry-based studies in medicine: a meta-research study.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- Arthroplasty registries at a glance: an initiative of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) to facilitate access, understanding, and reporting of registry data from an international perspective.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of machine learning trends and hotspots in arthroplasty literature over 31 years.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Internationalization and Collaboration in Colombian Psychology During 2014-2023: A Bibliometric Analysis.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2024Article
- The utilization of US-based large data in arthroplasty research: Bibiliometric analysis of trends and hotspots.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Scientific Knowledge Graph of Dysmenorrhea: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2001 to 2021.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Analysis of the Most Frequently Cited Articles in Hand and Wrist Surgery: A Modern Reading List.Cureus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose - The main purpose of arthroplasty registries is to collect information on patients, techniques, and devices to monitor and improve the outcome of the specific procedure. This study analyses the role played by registries in the orthopedic research community and describes publication trends, characteristics, and patterns of this field of research.Patients and methods - A descriptive-bibliometric review was conducted. Scopus was the database used for the research. All articles published from 1991 to December 2020 containing keywords related to registries and arthroplasty were considered. In particular, the following dimensions were analyzed in detail: (i) papers/year; (ii) journals; (iii) countries; (iv) research growth rate; (v) collaboration among countries. VOSviewer software was used to perform the bibliometric analysis. Finally, the 50 most cited papers of the last 10 years were briefly analyzed.Results - 3,933 articles were identified. There has been growing interest in the topic since 2010. Acta Orthopaedica ranked first for the number of articles published. The country with the largest number of articles citing registries was the United States, followed by the United Kingdom and Sweden. The relative number of articles per 100,000 inhabitants is 0.60 for Europe and 0.38 for the United States. The literature in this research area has an average yearly growth rate of 28%.Interpretation - The publication rate in the field of arthroplasty registries is constantly growing with a noteworthy impact in the evolution of this research and clinical area. The growth rate is significantly higher than that of arthroplasty literature (28% vs. 10%) and the collaboration among countries is strong and increasing with time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.