ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021
Crowdfunding as a response to COVID-19: Increasing inequities at a time of crisis.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crowdfunding for health research: a qualitative evidence synthesis and a pilot programme.BMJ global health · 2022Pooled it
- Understanding the Needs and Financial Challenges of Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa: Insights From Donation Requests.Pediatric dermatology · 2026Article
- Designing a Smart Product-Service System to support digital crowdfunding platforms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Inequity in Washington state covid-19-related crowdfunding.Social sciences & humanities open · 2024Article
- Investigating Racial Disparities in Cancer Crowdfunding: A Comprehensive Study of Medical GoFundMe Campaigns.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Racial and gender disparities among highly successful medical crowdfunding campaigns.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2023Article
- International medical tourism of US cancer patients for alternative cancer treatments: Financial, demographic, and clinical profiles of online crowdfunding campaigns.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Review
- Struggling, helping and adapting: Crowdfunding motivations and outcomes during the early US COVID-19 pandemic.Sociology of health & illness · 2023Article
- What Determines the Success of Charitable Crowdfunding Campaigns? Evidence from China During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Voluntas : international journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations · 2023Article
- Article
- Doing 'our bit': Solidarity, inequality, and COVID-19 crowdfunding for the UK National Health Service.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Article
- Article
- COVID-19 Misinformation and Social Network Crowdfunding: Cross-sectional Study of Alternative Treatments and Antivaccine Mandates.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Crowdsourcing Medical Costs in Dermatology: Cross-sectional Study Analyzing Dermatologic GoFundMe Campaigns.JMIR dermatology · 2022Article
- Medical Crowdfunding and Disparities in Health Care Access in the United States, 2016‒2020.American journal of public health · 2022Article
- An overview of Fintech applications to solve the puzzle of health care funding: state-of-the-art in medical crowdfunding.Financial innovation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
During the first seven months of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 175,000 crowdfunding campaigns were established in the US for coronavirus-related needs using the platform GoFundMe. Though charitable crowdfunding has been popular in recent years, the widespread creation of COVID-19 related campaigns points to potential shifts in how the platform is being used, and the volume of needs users have brought to the site during a profound economic, social, and epidemiological crisis. This study offers a systematic examination of the scope and impacts of COVID-19 related crowdfunding in the early months of the pandemic and assesses how existing social and health inequities shaped crowdfunding use and outcomes. Using data collected from all US-based GoFundMe campaigns mentioning COVID or coronavirus, we used descriptive analysis and a series of negative binomial and linear models to assess the contributions of demographic factors and COVID-19 impacts to campaign creation and outcome. We find significant evidence of growing inequalities in outcomes for campaigners. We find that crowdfunding provides substantially higher benefits in wealthier counties with higher levels of education. People from these areas are more likely to initiate campaigns in response to adverse health and economic impacts of COVID-19, and they also receive more funding compared to people living in areas with lower income and education. Modeling also indicates differential outcomes based on the racial and ethnic composition of county population, though without more detail about who is creating and funding campaigns we cannot explain causality. A targeted qualitative analysis of the top earning COVID-19 campaigns offers further evidence of how user privilege and corporate practices contribute to highly unequal outcomes. Taken together, these findings demonstrate how a market-oriented digital technology used to respond to large-scale crisis can exacerbate inequalities and further benefit already privileged groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.