Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139453›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2021

Molecular subtypes based on CNVs related gene signatures identify candidate prognostic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.

Baihui Li, Ziqi Huang, Wenwen Yu, Shaochuan Liu, Jian Zhang, Qingqing Wang, Lei Wu, Fan Kou, Lili Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Baihui LiDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Ziqi HuangDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Wenwen YuDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Shaochuan LiuDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Jian ZhangSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China; Department of Oncology, Oncology Laboratory, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Qingqing WangDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Lei WuDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Fan KouDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Lili YangDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China. Electronic address: yanglili@tjmuch.com.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classical factors for predicting prognosis currently cannot meet the developing requirements of individualized and accurate prognostic evaluation in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). With the rapid development of high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies, genomic changes have been discovered. These sequencing data provide unprecedented opportunities for identifying cancer molecular subtypes. In this article, we classified LUAD into two distinct molecular subtypes (Cluster 1 and Cluster 2) based on Copy Number Variations (CNVs) and mRNA expression data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) based on non-negative matrix factorization. Patients in Cluster 1 had worse outcomes than that in Cluster 2. Molecular features in subtypes were assessed to explain this phenomenon by analyzing differential expression genes expression pattern, which involved in cellular processes and environmental information processing. Analysis of immune cell populations suggested different distributions of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and dendritic cells in the two subtypes. Subsequently, two novel genes, TROAP and RASGRF1, were discovered to be prognostic biomarkers in TCGA, which were confirmed in GSE31210 and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital LUAD cohorts. We further proved their crucial roles in cancers by vitro experiments. TROAP mediates tumor cell proliferation, cycle, invasion, and migration, not apoptosis. RASGRF1 has a significant effect on tumor microenvironment. In conclusion, our study provides a novel insight into molecular classification based on CNVs related genes in LUAD, which may contribute to identify new molecular subtypes and target genes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsAdenocarcinoma of LungAgedAged, 80 and overCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorRNA, MessengerCNVsLUADMolecular subtypesPrognostic biomarkersRASGRF1TROAP

Identifiers

PMID34139453
PMCPMC8208901
OpenAlexW3168238605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.