Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139452›Full record

ReviewNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2021

Ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood tumor barrier for improved therapeutic delivery.

T A Arsiwala, S A Sprowls, K E Blethen, C E Adkins, P A Saralkar, R A Fladeland, W Pentz, A Gabriele, B Kielkowski, R I Mehta and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HIFU-Driven Targeted Pyroptosis Therapy in Basal-Like Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T A ArsiwalaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
S A SprowlsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
K E BlethenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
C E AdkinsSchool of Pharmacy, South University, Savannah, GA.
P A SaralkarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
R A FladelandDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
W PentzDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
A GabrieleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
B KielkowskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV.
R I MehtaRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Department of Neuroradiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
P WangRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Department of Neuroradiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
J S CarpenterRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Department of Neuroradiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
M RanjanRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Departments of Neuroscience and Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
U NajibRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Department of Neurology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
A R RezaiRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Departments of Neuroscience and Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
P R LockmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, HSC, Morgantown, WV. Electronic address: prlockman@wvu.hsc.edu.
West Virginia University · USSouth University · US

Funding

WVU Flow Cytometry and Single Cell Core Facility (FCSCCF)P20GM121322 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI William Harry Walker · 2018 to 2026
$22.4M
Translational use of focused ultrasound to increase blood-tumor barrier permeability as a mechanism to increase drug accumulation into brain metastases of breast cancerF99CA264445 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI ARSIWALA, TASNEEM · 2021 to 2022
$85k
Disruptive methods for increased chemotherapy distribution into preclinical brain metastases of breast cancer leading to improved tumor kill and prolonged survival.F99CA253768 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI SPROWLS, SAMUEL ADAM TYLER · 2020 to 2021
$47k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA253768NCI NIH HHS F99 CA264445NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a major anatomical and physiological barrier limiting the passage of drugs into brain. Central nervous system tumors can impair the BBB by changing the tumor microenvironment leading to the formation of a leaky barrier, known as the blood-tumor barrier (BTB). Despite the change in integrity, the BTB remains effective in preventing delivery of chemotherapy into brain tumors. Focused ultrasound is a unique noninvasive technique that can transiently disrupt the BBB and increase accumulation of drugs within targeted areas of the brain. Herein, we summarize the current understanding of different types of targeted ultrasound mediated BBB/BTB disruption techniques. We also discuss influence of the tumor microenvironment on BBB opening, as well as the role of immunological response following disruption. Lastly, we highlight the gaps between evaluation of the parameters governing opening of the BBB/BTB. A deeper understanding of physical opening of the BBB/BTB and the biological effects following disruption can potentially enhance treatment strategies for patients with brain tumors.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsUltrasonic WavesAnimalsBiological TransportBiological Variation, PopulationBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPermeabilityTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentUltrasonic TherapyBlood-brain barrierBlood-tumor barrierDisruptionDrug deliveryFocused ultrasoundPermeability

Identifiers

PMID34139452
PMCPMC8208897
OpenAlexW3166320394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.