Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139207›Full record

Observational studyChest2021

Practice, Outcomes, and Complications of Emergent Endotracheal Intubation by Critical Care Practitioners During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Peter C Nauka, Jen-Ting Chen, Ariel L Shiloh, Lewis A Eisen, Daniel G Fein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05520762 (Hospital Airway Resuscitation Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05520762 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Hospital Airway Resuscitation Trial: A Cluster-Randomized, Pragmatic Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2023 to 2027Enrolled1,060ConditionsCardiac Arrest, Respiratory FailureArmsA strategy of first choice supraglottic airway, A strategy of first choice endotracheal intubation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscope, King VisionJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter C NaukaInternal Medicine Residency Program, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Jen-Ting ChenDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Ariel L ShilohDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Lewis A EisenDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Daniel G FeinDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY. Electronic address: dafei@montefiore.org.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with COVID-19 who undergo emergency endotracheal intubation, data are limited regarding the practice, outcomes, and complications of this procedure. RESEARCH QUESTION: For patients with COVID-19 requiring emergency endotracheal intubation, how do the procedural techniques, the incidence of first-pass success, and the complications associated with the procedure compare with intubations of critically ill patients before the COVID-19 pandemic? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with COVID-19 at Montefiore Medical Center who underwent first-time endotracheal intubation by critical care physicians between July 19, 2019, and May 1, 2020. The first COVID-19 patient was admitted to our institution on March 11, 2020; patients admitted before this date are designated the prepandemic cohort. Descriptive statistics were used to compare groups. A Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. For continuous variables, a two-tailed Student t test was used for parametric variables or a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for nonparametric variables.

resultsOne thousand two hundred sixty intubations met inclusion criteria (782 prepandemic cohort, 478 pandemic cohort). Patients during the pandemic were more likely to be intubated for hypoxemic respiratory failure (72.6% vs 28.1%; P < .01). During the pandemic, operators were more likely to use video laryngoscopy (89.4% vs 53.3%; P < .01) and neuromuscular blocking agents (86.0% vs 46.2%; P < .01). First-pass success was higher during the pandemic period (94.6% vs 82.9%; P < .01). The rate of associated complications was higher during the pandemic (29.5% vs 15.2%; P < .01), a finding driven by a higher rate of hypoxemia during or immediately after the procedure (25.7% vs 8.2%; P < .01).

interpretationVideo laryngoscopy and neuromuscular blockade were used increasingly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite a higher rate of first-pass success during the pandemic, the incidence of complications associated with the procedure was higher.

Indexed as

Critical CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleHumansIncidenceIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesNeuromuscular Blocking Agentsairway managementintratrachealintubationmechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID34139207
PMCPMC8204844
OpenAlexW3171730205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.