Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2021
Cardiovascular safety of vibegron, a new β3-adrenoceptor agonist, in older patients with overactive bladder: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative phase 3 study.
Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular safety of vibegron, a new β3-adrenoceptor agonist, in older patients with overactive bladder: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative phase 3 study.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2021Trial
- Navigating the challenges of overactive bladder management in women.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Real-world persistence of vibegron in patients aged ≥ 80 years with overactive bladder: a multicenter cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Observational
- Safety and Effectiveness of Vibegron in Japanese Patients With Overactive Bladder: A Japanese Postmarketing Survey.Lower urinary tract symptoms · 2024Article
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Bridging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron in Treating Korean Patients With Overactive Bladder.International neurourology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo examine the safety and efficacy of vibegron, a new β3-adrenoceptor agonist, in patients aged ≥65 years, with a focus on the effects on cardiovascular system and overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.
methodsA post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative phase 3 study of vibegron, including those assigned to receive either vibegron 50 mg (V50), vibegron 100 mg (V100), or placebo for 12 weeks. Subjects were stratified into two subgroups based on age: a <65-year subgroup and a ≥65-year subgroup. Safety (changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and residual urine volume) and efficacy (changes in the numbers of micturitions, urgency episodes, urgency urinary incontinence [UUI] episodes, and the voided volume/micturition) were assessed in the subgroups treated with vibegron vs. placebo.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the cardiovascular outcomes (blood pressure and pulse rate), nor in the changes in residual urine volume, between the V50/100 and placebo groups in the <65-year or ≥65-year subgroup after 12-week treatment. Adverse events were slightly increased in the ≥65-year subgroup. In the efficacy analysis, V50/100 demonstrated similar efficacy in the <65-year and ≥65-year subgroups; an increasing trend in the voided volume/micturition was observed in subjects aged ≥65 years compared to subjects aged <65 years.
conclusionsVibegron was suggested to be similarly effective in patients ≥65 and <65 years and to have minimal influence on cardiovascular parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.