Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139026›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2021

Infectivity assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in samples from patients with COVID-19.

Satoshi Hiroi, Ritsuko Kubota-Koketsu, Tadahiro Sasaki, Saeko Morikawa, Kazushi Motomura, Emi E Nakayama, Yoshinobu Okuno, Tatsuo Shioda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests for screening of healthcare workers; experience with over 48,000 combined antigen tests and RT-PCR tests.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus varies across different paper types.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Satoshi HiroiDivision of Microbiology, Virology Section, Osaka Institute of Public Health, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9825-3425
Ritsuko Kubota-KoketsuDepartment of Viral Infections, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Tadahiro SasakiDepartment of Viral Infections, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3473-3803
Saeko MorikawaDivision of Microbiology, Virology Section, Osaka Institute of Public Health, Osaka, Japan.
Kazushi MotomuraDivision of Microbiology, Virology Section, Osaka Institute of Public Health, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-7333
Emi E NakayamaDepartment of Viral Infections, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinobu OkunoOsaka Institute of Public Health, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuo ShiodaDepartment of Viral Infections, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP20nk0101602MHLW Health Labor Sciences Research 20CA2058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, laboratory diagnosis has mainly been conducted using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Detecting the presence of an infectious virus in the collected sample is essential to analyze if a person can transmit infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, there have been no quantitative investigations conducted for infectious SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Therefore, in the present study, a rapid and simple focus-forming assay using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique was developed to quantify infectious SARS-CoV-2 titers in 119 samples (n = 52, nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS]; n = 67, saliva) from patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, the study findings were compared with the cycle threshold (Ct) values of real-time RT-PCR. The infectious virus titers in NPS samples and Ct values were inversely correlated, and no infectious virus could be detected when the Ct value exceeded 30. In contrast, a low correlation was observed between the infectious virus titers in saliva and Ct values (r = -0.261, p = 0.027). Furthermore, the infectious virus titers in the saliva were significantly lower than those in the NPS samples. Ten days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms, the infectious virus was undetectable, and Ct values were more than 30 in NSP and saliva samples. The results indicate that patients whose symptoms subsided 10 days after onset, with Ct values more than 30 in NSP and saliva samples, were less likely to infect others.

Indexed as

COVID-19 TestingViral Plaque AssayAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionCOVID-19Ct valueinfectious virus titernasopharyngeal swabsalivaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34139026
PMCPMC8426682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.