Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34139009›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

DnaB helicase dynamics in bacterial DNA replication resolved by single-molecule studies.

Richard R Spinks, Lisanne M Spenkelink, Sarah A Stratmann, Zhi-Qiang Xu, N Patrick J Stamford, Susan E Brown, Nicholas E Dixon, Slobodan Jergic, Antoine M van Oijen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ribosome-induced mRNA pseudoknot interactions visualized by DMS MaP-Seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A conservedMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. A bipartite interaction with the processivity clamp potentiates Pol IV-mediated TLS.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard R SpinksMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8485-2336
Lisanne M SpenkelinkMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.
Sarah A StratmannZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands.
Zhi-Qiang XuMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.
N Patrick J StamfordResearch School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Susan E BrownResearch School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Nicholas E DixonMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-6945
Slobodan JergicMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.
Antoine M van OijenMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.
University of Wollongong · AUAustralian National University · AUUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Escherichia coli, the DnaB helicase forms the basis for the assembly of the DNA replication complex. The stability of DnaB at the replication fork is likely important for successful replication initiation and progression. Single-molecule experiments have significantly changed the classical model of highly stable replication machines by showing that components exchange with free molecules from the environment. However, due to technical limitations, accurate assessments of DnaB stability in the context of replication are lacking. Using in vitro fluorescence single-molecule imaging, we visualise DnaB loaded on forked DNA templates. That these helicases are highly stable at replication forks, indicated by their observed dwell time of ∼30 min. Addition of the remaining replication factors results in a single DnaB helicase integrated as part of an active replisome. In contrast to the dynamic behaviour of other replisome components, DnaB is maintained within the replisome for the entirety of the replication process. Interestingly, we observe a transient interaction of additional helicases with the replication fork. This interaction is dependent on the τ subunit of the clamp-loader complex. Collectively, our single-molecule observations solidify the role of the DnaB helicase as the stable anchor of the replisome, but also reveal its capacity for dynamic interactions.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationDnaB HelicasesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEscherichia coliMultienzyme ComplexesReplisomesSingle Molecule ImagingDnaB HelicasesdnaB protein, E coliDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseMultienzyme ComplexesReplisomes

Identifiers

PMID34139009
PMCPMC8266626
OpenAlexW3167135467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.