Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34138905›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Mouse lung automated segmentation tool for quantifying lung tumors after micro-computed tomography.

Mary Katherine Montgomery, John David, Haikuo Zhang, Sripad Ram, Shibing Deng, Vidya Premkumar, Lisa Manzuk, Ziyue Karen Jiang, Anand Giddabasappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary Katherine MontgomeryComparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
John DavidComparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Haikuo ZhangOncology Research Unit, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Sripad RamDrug Safety Research Unit, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Shibing DengEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Vidya PremkumarComparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5107-9084
Lisa ManzukComparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Ziyue Karen JiangComparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Anand GiddabasappaComparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1546-2481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike the majority of cancers, survival for lung cancer has not shown much improvement since the early 1970s and survival rates remain low. Genetically engineered mice tumor models are of high translational relevance as we can generate tissue specific mutations which are observed in lung cancer patients. Since these tumors cannot be detected and quantified by traditional methods, we use micro-computed tomography imaging for longitudinal evaluation and to measure response to therapy. Conventionally, we analyze microCT images of lung cancer via a manual segmentation. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and sensitive to intra- and inter-analyst variation. To overcome the limitations of manual segmentation, we set out to develop a fully-automated alternative, the Mouse Lung Automated Segmentation Tool (MLAST). MLAST locates the thoracic region of interest, thresholds and categorizes the lung field into three tissue categories: soft tissue, intermediate, and lung. An increase in the tumor burden was measured by a decrease in lung volume with a simultaneous increase in soft and intermediate tissue quantities. MLAST segmentation was validated against three methods: manual scoring, manual segmentation, and histology. MLAST was applied in an efficacy trial using a Kras/Lkb1 non-small cell lung cancer model and demonstrated adequate precision and sensitivity in quantifying tumor growth inhibition after drug treatment. Implementation of MLAST has considerably accelerated the microCT data analysis, allowing for larger study sizes and mid-study readouts. This study illustrates how automated image analysis tools for large datasets can be used in preclinical imaging to deliver high throughput and quantitative results.

Indexed as

AMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnimalsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMiceNeoplasms, ExperimentalProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTumor BurdenX-Ray MicrotomographyAMP-Activated Protein KinasesHras protein, mouseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Stk11 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID34138905
PMCPMC8211241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.