Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34138904›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Association of surgeon and hospital volume with short-term outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nationwide, population-based study.

Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman, Erik Persson, Walter Cazzaniga, Fredrik Sandin, Stefan Carlsson, Göran Ahlgren, Eva Johansson, David Robinsson, Jonas Hugosson, Pär Stattin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of race and 30-day postoperative complications after urologic oncology surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecka Arnsrud GodtmanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Göteborg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-6550
Erik PerssonRegional Cancer Center Uppsala Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden.
Walter CazzanigaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Fredrik SandinRegional Cancer Center Uppsala Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan CarlssonDivision of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Göran AhlgrenDepartment of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Eva JohanssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
David RobinssonDepartment of Urology, Högland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3433-8873
Jonas HugossonDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Göteborg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Pär StattinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveFew studies have investigated the association between surgical volume and outcome of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in an unselected cohort. We sought to investigate the association between surgical volume with peri-operative and short-term outcomes in a nation-wide, population-based study group.

methods9,810 RARP's registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden (2015-2018) were included. Associations between outcome and volume were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression including age, PSA-density, number of positive biopsy cores, cT stage, Gleason score, and extent of lymph node dissection.

resultsSurgeons and hospitals in the highest volume group compared to lowest group had shorter operative time; surgeon (OR 9.20, 95% CI 7.11-11.91), hospital (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.53-3.06), less blood loss; surgeon (OR 2.58. 95% CI 2.07-3.21) hospital (no difference), more often nerve sparing intention; surgeon (OR 2.89, 95% CI 2.34-3.57), hospital (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.66-2.44), negative margins; surgeon (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.54-2.35), hospital (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.53). There was wide range in outcome between hospitals and surgeons with similar volume that remained after adjustment.

conclusionsHigh surgeon and hospital volume were associated with better outcomes. The range in outcome was wide in all volume groups, which indicates that factors besides volume are of importance. Registration of surgical performance is essential for quality control and improvement.

Indexed as

AgedHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingOperative TimePerioperative PeriodProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsSweden

Identifiers

PMID34138904
PMCPMC8211177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.