Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34138851›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2021

Multi-morbidity and blood pressure trajectories in hypertensive patients: A multiple landmark cohort study.

Jenny Tran, Robyn Norton, Dexter Canoy, Jose Roberto Ayala Solares, Nathalie Conrad, Milad Nazarzadeh, Francesca Raimondi, Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi, Anthony Rodgers, Kazem Rahimi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jenny TranDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1774-8803
Robyn NortonThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3988-315X
Dexter CanoyDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-9901
Jose Roberto Ayala SolaresDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8322-6723
Nathalie ConradDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5027-5481
Milad NazarzadehDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-8874
Francesca RaimondiDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5598-7736
Gholamreza Salimi-KhorshidiDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4166-2858
Anthony RodgersThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1282-1896
Kazem RahimiDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBUNSW Sydney · AUNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation ES/P011055/1British Heart Foundation FS/19/36/34346Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur knowledge of how to better manage elevated blood pressure (BP) in the presence of comorbidities is limited, in part due to exclusion or underrepresentation of patients with multiple chronic conditions from major clinical trials. We aimed to investigate the burden and types of comorbidities in patients with hypertension and to assess how such comorbidities and other variables affect BP levels over time. METHODS AND

findingsIn this multiple landmark cohort study, we used linked electronic health records from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to compare systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels in 295,487 patients (51% women) aged 61.5 (SD = 13.1) years with first recorded diagnosis of hypertension between 2000 and 2014, by type and numbers of major comorbidities, from at least 5 years before and up to 10 years after hypertension diagnosis. Time-updated multivariable linear regression analyses showed that the presence of more comorbidities was associated with lower SBP during follow-up. In hypertensive patients without comorbidities, mean SBP at diagnosis and at 10 years were 162.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 162.0 to 162.6) and 140.5 mm Hg (95% CI 140.4 to 140.6), respectively; in hypertensive patients with ≥5 comorbidities, these were 157.3 mm Hg (95% CI 156.9 to 157.6) and 136.8 mm Hg (95% 136.4 to 137.3), respectively. This inverse association between numbers of comorbidities and SBP was not specific to particular types of comorbidities, although associations were stronger in those with preexisting cardiovascular disease. Retrospective analysis of recorded SBP showed that the difference in mean SBP 5 years before diagnosis between those without and with ≥5 comorbidities was -9 mm Hg (95% CI -9.7 to -8.3), suggesting that mean recorded SBP already differed according to the presence of comorbidity before baseline. Within 1 year after the diagnosis, SBP substantially declined, but subsequent SBP changes across comorbidity status were modest, with no evidence of a more rapid decline in those with more or specific types of comorbidities. We identified factors, such as prescriptions of antihypertensive drugs and frequency of healthcare visits, that can explain SBP differences according to numbers or types of comorbidities, but these factors only partly explained the recorded SBP differences. Nevertheless, some limitations have to be considered including the possibility that diagnosis of some conditions may not have been recorded, varying degrees of missing data inherent in analytical datasets extracted from routine health records, and greater measurement errors in clinical measurements taken in routine practices than those taken in well-controlled clinical study settings.

conclusionsBP levels at which patients were diagnosed with hypertension varied substantially according to the presence of comorbidities and were lowest in patients with multi-morbidity. Our findings suggest that this early selection bias of hypertension diagnosis at different BP levels was a key determinant of long-term differences in BP by comorbidity status. The lack of a more rapid decline in SBP in those with multi-morbidity provides some reassurance for BP treatment in these high-risk individuals.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultimorbidityPrognosisProspective StudiesAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID34138851
PMCPMC8248714
OpenAlexW3169059180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.