Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34138845›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Estimating the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in the United States using influenza surveillance, virologic testing, and mortality data: Four complementary approaches.

Fred S Lu, Andre T Nguyen, Nicholas B Link, Mathieu Molina, Jessica T Davis, Matteo Chinazzi, Xinyue Xiong, Alessandro Vespignani, Marc Lipsitch, Mauricio Santillana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterizing population-level changes in human behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Asymmetry in the peak in Covid-19 daily cases and the pandemic R-parameter.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Stigma, Post-traumatic Stress, and COVID-19 Vaccination Intent in Mongolia, India, and the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fred S LuDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1026-5734
Andre T NguyenUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-6879
Nicholas B LinkComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4078-4842
Mathieu MolinaComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jessica T DavisLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0726-1855
Matteo ChinazziLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-1929
Xinyue XiongLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Alessandro VespignaniLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-4205
Marc LipsitchDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1504-9213
Mauricio SantillanaComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Development of an Open-Source and Data-Driven Modeling Platform to Monitor and Forecast Disease ActivityR01GM130668 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SANTILLANA, MAURICIO · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Statistical and Quantitative Training in Big Data Health ScienceT32LM012411 · NLM · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effectively designing and evaluating public health responses to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic requires accurate estimation of the prevalence of COVID-19 across the United States (US). Equipment shortages and varying testing capabilities have however hindered the usefulness of the official reported positive COVID-19 case counts. We introduce four complementary approaches to estimate the cumulative incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 in each state in the US as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, using a combination of excess influenza-like illness reports, COVID-19 test statistics, COVID-19 mortality reports, and a spatially structured epidemic model. Instead of relying on the estimate from a single data source or method that may be biased, we provide multiple estimates, each relying on different assumptions and data sources. Across our four approaches emerges the consistent conclusion that on April 4, 2020, the estimated case count was 5 to 50 times higher than the official positive test counts across the different states. Nationally, our estimates of COVID-19 symptomatic cases as of April 4 have a likely range of 2.3 to 4.8 million, with possibly as many as 7.6 million cases, up to 25 times greater than the cumulative confirmed cases of about 311,000. Extending our methods to May 16, 2020, we estimate that cumulative symptomatic incidence ranges from 4.9 to 10.1 million, as opposed to 1.5 million positive test counts. The proposed combination of approaches may prove useful in assessing the burden of COVID-19 during resurgences in the US and other countries with comparable surveillance systems.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanModels, StatisticalPopulation SurveillanceSARS-CoV-2COVID-19HumansIncidencePandemicsUnited StatesVirology

Identifiers

PMID34138845
PMCPMC8241061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.