Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34138842›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2021

Reflecting on 20 years of breast cancer modeling in CISNET: Recommendations for future cancer systems modeling efforts.

Amy Trentham-Dietz, Oguzhan Alagoz, Christina Chapman, Xuelin Huang, Jinani Jayasekera, Nicolien T van Ravesteyn, Sandra J Lee, Clyde B Schechter, Jennifer M Yeh, Sylvia K Plevritis and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Data gaps and opportunities for modeling cancer health equity.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy Trentham-DietzDepartment of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5971-4660
Oguzhan AlagozDepartment of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5133-1382
Christina ChapmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-5398
Xuelin HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-9336
Jinani JayasekeraDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9212-7225
Nicolien T van RavesteynDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-466X
Sandra J LeeDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Clyde B SchechterDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-2827
Jennifer M YehDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-7404
Sylvia K PlevritisDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2796-9180
Jeanne S MandelblattDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Breast Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)
Georgetown University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USBoston Children's Hospital · USErasmus MC · NLHarvard University · USStanford University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Comparative Modeling of Precision Breast Cancer Control Across the Translational Continuum - SupplementU01CA253911 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ALAGOZ, OGUZHAN, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2020 to 2025
$10.6M
Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice and PolicyU01CA199218 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2015 to 2019
$9.0M
Vermont Screening Process Documentation UnitU54CA163303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPRAGUE, BRIAN L · 2011 to 2017
$6.4M
Bio-behavioral Research At The Intersection of Cancer and AgingR35CA197289 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2015 to 2021
$6.2M
A Simulation Model-based Framework to Support Oncology Guidelines and PracticeK99CA241397 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI JAYASEKERA, JINANI · 2020 to 2021
$351k
A Simulation Modeling Study to Support Personalized Breast Cancer Prevention and Early Detection in High-Risk WomenR03CA259896 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2021 to 2022
$156k
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201100031CNCI NIH HHS K99 CA241397NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R03 CA259896NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197289NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199218NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253911NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2000, the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) modeling teams have developed and applied microsimulation and statistical models of breast cancer. Here, we illustrate the use of collaborative breast cancer multilevel systems modeling in CISNET to demonstrate the flexibility of systems modeling to address important clinical and policy-relevant questions. Challenges and opportunities of future systems modeling are also summarized. The 6 CISNET breast cancer models embody the key features of systems modeling by incorporating numerous data sources and reflecting tumor, person, and health system factors that change over time and interact to affect the burden of breast cancer. Multidisciplinary modeling teams have explored alternative representations of breast cancer to reveal insights into breast cancer natural history, including the role of overdiagnosis and race differences in tumor characteristics. The models have been used to compare strategies for improving the balance of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening based on personal risk factors, including age, breast density, polygenic risk, and history of Down syndrome or a history of childhood cancer. The models have also provided evidence to support the delivery of care by simulating outcomes following clinical decisions about breast cancer treatment and estimating the relative impact of screening and treatment on the United States population. The insights provided by the CISNET breast cancer multilevel modeling efforts have informed policy and clinical guidelines. The 20 years of CISNET modeling experience has highlighted opportunities and challenges to expanding the impact of systems modeling. Moving forward, CISNET research will continue to use systems modeling to address cancer control issues, including modeling structural inequities affecting racial disparities in the burden of breast cancer. Future work will also leverage the lessons from team science, expand resource sharing, and foster the careers of early stage modeling scientists to ensure the sustainability of these efforts.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34138842
PMCPMC8211268
OpenAlexW3170676943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.