ArticleJCO global oncology2021
Reporting Incidences of Neuroblastoma in Various Resource Settings.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting GD2 with CAR-T Cell Therapy in Neuroblastoma: Updates, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Clinical patterns, treatment outcomes and determinant factors in children with neuroblastoma in a tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Pre-clinical anti-tumor activity and preliminary safety of METTL3 inhibitors STM2457 and UZH1a in neuroblastoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Bilateral blindness from optic chiasm metastasis as the initial presentation of stage 4 neuroblastoma: A case report.Medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Preclinical Analysis of Anti-B7-H3 CAR-T Cells Targeting Neuroblastoma.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The relative contributions of genetic and non-genetic factors to the risk of neuroblastoma.Pediatric investigation · 2025Review
- Risk stratification in neuroblastoma patients through machine learning in the multicenter PRIMAGE cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The apoptotic effect of garlicTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2024Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of the Therapeutic Outcomes of 117 Neuroblastoma Patients Treated at a Single Pediatric Oncology Center in China.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe incidences of neuroblastoma (NB) differ significantly between various resource settings because of varying quality of cancer registries and underdiagnoses. This study aimed to evaluate current regional variations as reported by international cancer registries and the theoretical and reported differences in international NB incidences and to evaluate South Africa (SA) as a case for variable reporting.
methodsA comprehensive literature review on registries reporting on NB was performed to construct incidence tables. The SEER Program incidence of 10.5/million children was used to calculate the expected number of NB cases for each country. Registry data of NB cases between 2000 and 2016 were requested from The South African National Cancer registry (SA-NCR) and the South African Children's Tumour Registry (SACTR) for comparison and to perform a probabilistic linkage study.
resultsInternationally, incidences varied between -97.1% and +80% compared with the SEER program. SA under-reported NB cases by an estimated 74.2%. Between 2000 and 2016, the SA-NCR reported between 23 and 51 cases/year, whereas the SACTR reported between 18 and 57 cases/year for the same period. The incidence reported by the SA-NCR varied between 1.5 and 2.8/million children under 15-year per year, whereas the SACTR reported 1.74-2.6 cases/million children. Both registries reported incidences less than high-income country. A probabilistic record linkage of the two registries resulted in a combined incidence of 2.9 cases/million children.
conclusionAs with most low- and middle-income countries, SA has either a lower incidence or underdiagnoses of NB cases. The reasons for under-reporting are not clear, but can be due to undiagnosed NB cases with spontaneous regression, missed possible cases because of lack of autopsies, and diagnosed cases not recorded in registries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.