Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34138403›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2021

LPCANet: Classification of Laryngeal Cancer Histopathological Images Using a CNN with Position Attention and Channel Attention Mechanisms.

Xiaoli Zhou, Chaowei Tang, Pan Huang, Francesco Mercaldo, Antonella Santone, Yanqing Shao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. GPTNeXt: Biomedical Image Classification Investigations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoli ZhouSchool of Microelectronics and Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-526X
Chaowei TangSchool of Microelectronics and Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China. cwtang@cqu.edu.cn.
Pan HuangSchool of Microelectronics and Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China. panhuang@cqu.edu.cn.
Francesco MercaldoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Antonella SantoneDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Yanqing ShaoCommunication Engineering Department, Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering, Chongqing, 401331, China.
Chongqing University · CNUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laryngeal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in otolaryngology, and histopathological image analysis is the gold standard for the diagnosis of laryngeal cancer. However, pathologists have high subjectivity in their diagnoses, which makes it easy to miss diagnoses and misdiagnose. In addition, according to a literature search, there is currently no computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithm that has been applied to the classification of histopathological images of laryngeal cancer. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are widely used in various other cancer classification tasks. However, the potential global and channel relationships of images may be ignored, which will affect the feature representation ability. Simultaneously, due to the lack of interpretability, the results are often difficult to accept by pathologists. we propose a laryngeal cancer classification network (LPCANet) based on a CNN and attention mechanisms. First, the original histopathological images are sequentially cropped into patches. Then, the patches are input into the basic ResNet50 to extract the local features. Then, a position attention module and a channel attention module are added in parallel to capture the spatial dependency and the channel dependency, respectively. The two modules produce the fusion feature map to enhance the feature representation and improve network classification performance. Moreover, the fusion feature map is extracted and visually analyzed by the grad-weighted class activation map (Grad_CAM) to provide a certain interpretability for the final results. The three-class classification performance of LPCANet is better than those of the five state-of-the-art classifiers (VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, Xception and DenseNet121) on the two original resolutions (534 * 400 and 1067 * 800). On the 534 * 400 data, LPCANet achieved 73.18% accuracy, 74.04% precision, 73.15% recall, 72.9% F1-score, and 0.8826 AUC. On the 1067 * 800 data, LPCANet achieved 83.15% accuracy, 83.5% precision, 83.1% recall, 83.1% F1-score, and 0.9487 AUC. The results show that LPCANet enhances the feature representation by capturing the global and channel relationships and achieves better classification performance. In addition, the visual analysis of Grad_CAM makes the results interpretable, which makes it easier for the results to be accepted by pathologists and allows the method to become a second tool for auxiliary diagnosis.

Indexed as

Laryngeal NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerChannel attention mechanismGrad_CAMHistopathological imagesInterpretabilityLaryngeal cancer classificationPosition attention mechanism

Identifiers

PMID34138403
OpenAlexW3167463041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.