ArticleLasers in medical science2022
Photocoagulation-associated spontaneous release of epiretinal membrane secondary to retinal vascular tumor: case series of 8 cases.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous separation of epiretinal membrane associated with retinal hemangioblastoma: a case report with 10-year follow-up.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
- Spontaneous epiretinal membrane resolution: mechanisms, outcomes, and implications for clinical management.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Resolution of epiretinal membrane after anti-VEGF and photodynamic therapy of retinal hemangioblastoma.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- Case Report: Exacerbation and Spontaneous Separation of the Epiretinal Membrane Following Laser Photocoagulation of a Vasoproliferative Tumor of the Retina.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM) response after photocoagulation in retinal vascular tumor. This retrospective interventional case series included 8 patients (8 eyes) who were diagnosed with retinal vascular tumor and secondary ERM. All eyes were treated with photocoagulation and underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations at baseline and at each follow-up. Of the 8 eyes with retinal vascular tumor and associated ERM, 4 eyes (50%) were von Hippel and 4 eyes (50%) were vasoproliferative tumor of the retina. The mean follow-up time was 12.63 ± 14.64 (range, 4-51) months. The BCVA in the eyes at baseline was 1.16 ± 1.10 logMAR (range, HM to 20/40). ERM located in the macular region in 100% of the eyes and led to CME with a mean central foveal thickness of 497.6 ± 147.7 μm (range, 294-736 μm) at presentation. After photocoagulation, the ERM spontaneously peeled in 7 of 8 eyes (87.5%), among which one case required surgical treatment due to complicating tractional retinal detachment. After ERM peeling without complications, 6 eyes recovered normal macular structure, with an improved BCVA in 5 eyes and a stable BCVA in 1 eye. Laser photocoagulation is necessary and effective treatment for retinal vascular tumor. After laser photocoagulation, retinal vascular tumor-related ERM spontaneously released in 75% of the cases, without complication and surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.