ArticleDysphagia2022
Impact of Transoral Radiofrequency Microsurgery and Radiotherapy on Long-term Swallowing Function in Patients with T1 Glottic Carcinoma.
Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the impact of transoral radiofrequency microsurgery (TRM) and radiotherapy (RT) on long-term swallowing function in patients with T1 glottic carcinoma. A total of 41 cases of T1 glottic carcinoma treated with TRM or RT alone more than 5 years ago were collected, including 17 cases treated with TRM (TRM group) and 24 cases treated with RT (RT group). The Chinese version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CSWAL-QOL) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study results at the last follow-up (more than 5 years after TRM or RT) were assessed. The TRM group scored significantly better than the RT group on overall CSWAL-QOL, the Frequency score, and 6 out of 10 CSWAL-QOL dimensions. The RT group scored significantly better than the TRM group only on the Communication dimension. The dysphagia score (DS) and penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score of the TRM group were better than those of the RT group. The overall CSWAL-QOL score, the Frequency score, DS, and PAS scores were not significantly different between patients who received conventional radiotherapy and patients who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The RT dose was correlated with the DS. TRM provides better swallowing outcomes as compared to RT in management of early glottic cancer. In addition, there is a correlation between RT dose and dysphagia. Prospective studies should be conducted to further evaluate the impact of TRM and RT on swallowing function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34137932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.