ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021
Autopsy and pre-mortem diagnostic discrepancy review in an Irish tertiary PICU.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated with Autopsy Consent in Pediatric Oncology: A 10-Year Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Value of autopsy in the modern age: Discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnoses.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our study had two objectives: (1) to review ante- and post-mortem diagnoses and assign a Goldman error classification and (2) establish autopsy rates within our centre. We performed a retrospective analysis of autopsies performed on patients who died in our paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between November 13, 2012, and October 31, 2018. Medical and autopsy data of all patients was reviewed, and Goldman classification of discrepancy between ante- and post-mortem diagnoses was assigned. Our centre is a tertiary PICU, and we included all patients that died in PICU within the designated timeframe. Our results were as follows: 396 deaths occurred in PICU from 8329 (4.75%) admissions. Ninety-nine (25%) had an autopsy, 75 required by the coroner. All were included in the study. Fifty-three were male and 46 females. Fifty-three patients were transferred from external hospitals, 46 from our centre. Forty-one were neonates, 32 were < 1 year of age, and 26 were > 1 year of age. The median length of stay was 3 days. Eighteen were post-cardiac surgery, and three post-cardiac catheter procedure. Major diagnostic errors (class I/II) were identified in 14 (14.1%), 2 (2%) class I, and 12 (12.1%) were class II errors. Class III and IV errors occurred in 28 (28.2%) patients. Complete concordance (class V) occurred in 57 (57.5%) cases.Conclusion: We conclude that the autopsy rate and the diagnostic discrepancy rate within our PICU are comparable to those previously reported. Our findings show the continuing value of autopsy in determining the cause of death and providing greater diagnostic clarity. Given their value, post-mortem examinations, where indicated, should be considered part of a physician's duty of care to families and future patients. What is Known: • Major diagnostic discrepancies (class I/II) in PICU have been reported at 20.2%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.