Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34137794›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2021

Clinical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Treated With Pneumatic Retinopexy.

Nicolas A Yannuzzi, Charles Li, Danielle Fujino, Scott P Kelly, Flora Lum, Harry W Flynn, D Wilkin Parke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgical outcomes and risk factors identification for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by pneumatic retinopexy using pure air.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Outcomes and variables that impact pneumatic retinopexies.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas A YannuzziBascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Charles LiAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California.
Danielle FujinoAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California.
Scott P KellyAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California.
Flora LumAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California.
Harry W FlynnBascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
D Wilkin ParkeVitreoRetinal Surgery, PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
American Academy of Ophthalmology · USUniversity of Miami · USViteroRetinal Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePneumatic retinopexy (PR) is the only clinic-based method of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. Registry-acquired clinical practice setting outcomes data with this procedure have not yet been reported.

objectiveTo describe the clinical outcomes associated with RRD treated primarily with PR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIn this retrospective cohort study, data from patients 19 years and older with noncomplex RRD treated at academic and private ophthalmology practices participating in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) were analyzed. Data were collected from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019, and data were analyzed from January to December 2020. EXPOSURES: Data from the IRIS Registry were queried for eyes that underwent PR for noncomplex RRD and had at least 3 months of follow-up. Cases were identified by a combination of diagnosis code for RRD and a Current Procedural Terminology code for PR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of eyes that achieved single-operation success (SOS), defined as retinal reattachment without a subsequent retinal detachment surgery or repeated PR.

resultsOf 9553 included patients, 5827 (61.0%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 62 (10) years. A total of 9659 eyes were identified. SOS was achieved in 6613 eyes (68.5%). Best-corrected visual acuity significantly differed 9 to 12 months after treatment between the SOS group, with a mean of 0.24 logMAR (95% CI, 0.23-0.25; approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/35), and the single-operation failure group, with a mean of 0.43 logMAR (95% CI, 0.40-0.46; approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/54). Among all patients, the mean time to maximal visual recovery was 268 days (95% CI, 260-276). Endophthalmitis was observed in 3 eyes (0.03%). SOS was associated with female sex (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.38-1.65), while current smoking status was associated single-operation failure (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this registry-based study, which encompasses a large number of eyes drawn from multiple, heterogenous electronic health record systems, SOS was achieved in 68.5% of eyes with noncomplex RRD treated by primary PR. It is unknown how these outcomes would have compared with other methods of RRD repair in this cohort.

Identifiers

PMID34137794
PMCPMC8374615
OpenAlexW3168890324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.