Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34137724›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Rating Hospital Performance in China: Review of Publicly Available Measures and Development of a Ranking System.

Shengjie Dong, Ross Millar, Chenshu Shi, Minye Dong, Yuyin Xiao, Jie Shen, Guohong Li

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chinese contribution toAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Measuring Quality of Public Hospitals in Croatia Using a Multi-Criteria Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shengjie Dong *School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4573-8792
Ross Millar *Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5790-7947
Chenshu ShiCenter for Health Technology Assessment, China Hospital Development Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4995-4169
Minye DongSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6465-7015
Yuyin XiaoSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4621-9628
Jie ShenChina Hospital Development Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5847-8598
Guohong LiSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-5363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China, significant emphasis and investment in health care reform since 2009 has brought with it increasing scrutiny of its public hospitals. Calls for greater accountability in the quality of hospital care have led to increasing attention toward performance measurement and the development of hospital ratings. Despite such interest, there has yet to be a comprehensive analysis of what performance information is publicly available to understand the performance of hospitals in China.

objectiveThis study aims to review the publicly available performance information about hospitals in China to assess options for ranking hospital performance.

methodsA review was undertaken to identify performance measures based on publicly available data. Following several rounds of expert consultation regarding the utility of these measures, we clustered the available options into three key areas: research and development, academic reputation, and quality and safety. Following the identification and clustering of the available performance measures, we set out to translate these into a practical performance ranking system to assess variation in hospital performance.

resultsA new hospital ranking system termed the China Hospital Development Index (CHDI) is thus presented. Furthermore, we used CHDI for ranking well-known tertiary hospitals in China.

conclusionsDespite notable limitations, our assessment of available measures and the development of a new ranking system break new ground in understanding hospital performance in China. In doing so, CHDI has the potential to contribute to wider discussions and debates about assessing hospital performance across global health care systems.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformChinaHumansTertiary Care CentersChina health care reformhealth care qualityhospital rankingperformance measurement

Identifiers

PMID34137724
PMCPMC8277410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.