Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34137604›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2021

A New Library-Search Algorithm for Mixture Analysis Using DART-MS.

Arun S Moorthy, Edward Sisco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Updates to the Inverted Library Search Algorithm for Mixture Analysis.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arun S MoorthyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5988-1389
Edward SiscoNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0252-1910

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic analysis of seized drug evidence often involves determining whether the components of an unknown mixture are illicit compounds. One approach to this task is to screen the evidence using direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) to make presumptive identifications. This manuscript introduces a new library-search algorithm that enhances presumptive identifications of mixture components using a series of in-source collision-induced dissociation mass spectra collected through DART-MS. The multistage search, titled the Inverted Library-Search Algorithm (ILSA), identifies potential components in a mixture by first searching the lowest fragmentation mass spectrum for target peaks, assuming these peaks are protonated molecules, and then scoring each target peak with possible library matches. As a proof of concept, the ILSA is demonstrated through several example searches of model seized drug mixtures of acetyl fentanyl, benzyl fentanyl, amphetamine, and methamphetamine searched against a small library of select compounds and the freely available NIST DART-MS Forensics Database. Discussion of the search results and several open areas of research to further extend the method are provided. This new approach for presumptive identification provides analysts with refined information about mixture components and will be of immediate importance in forensic analysis using DART-MS. A prototype implementation of the ILSA is available at https://github.com/asm3-nist/DART-MS-DST.

Indexed as

algorithmsDART-MSlibrary searchingmass spectrometryseized drug analysis

Identifiers

PMID34137604
PMCPMC9808406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.