ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2021
A New Library-Search Algorithm for Mixture Analysis Using DART-MS.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- NIST Mass Spectrometry Data Center standard reference libraries and software tools: Application to seized drug analysis.Journal of forensic sciences · 2023Article
- On the challenge of unambiguous identification of fentanyl analogs: Exploring measurement diversity using standard reference mass spectral libraries.Journal of forensic sciences · 2023Article
- Expert Algorithm for Substance Identification Using Mass Spectrometry: Application to the Identification of Cocaine on Different Instruments Using Binary Classification Models.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023Article
- Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Review
- Qualitative Analysis of Real Drug Evidence Using DART-MS and the Inverted Library Search Algorithm.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022Article
- Updates to the Inverted Library Search Algorithm for Mixture Analysis.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022Article
- Applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in 2021: An annual review.Analytical science advances · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forensic analysis of seized drug evidence often involves determining whether the components of an unknown mixture are illicit compounds. One approach to this task is to screen the evidence using direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) to make presumptive identifications. This manuscript introduces a new library-search algorithm that enhances presumptive identifications of mixture components using a series of in-source collision-induced dissociation mass spectra collected through DART-MS. The multistage search, titled the Inverted Library-Search Algorithm (ILSA), identifies potential components in a mixture by first searching the lowest fragmentation mass spectrum for target peaks, assuming these peaks are protonated molecules, and then scoring each target peak with possible library matches. As a proof of concept, the ILSA is demonstrated through several example searches of model seized drug mixtures of acetyl fentanyl, benzyl fentanyl, amphetamine, and methamphetamine searched against a small library of select compounds and the freely available NIST DART-MS Forensics Database. Discussion of the search results and several open areas of research to further extend the method are provided. This new approach for presumptive identification provides analysts with refined information about mixture components and will be of immediate importance in forensic analysis using DART-MS. A prototype implementation of the ILSA is available at https://github.com/asm3-nist/DART-MS-DST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.