ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2021
Sex-specific differences in blood lipids and lipid ratios in type 2 diabetic foot patients.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between Lipid Profile and Apolipoproteins with Risk of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Pooled it
- Analysis of risk-factors associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients with alzheimer's disease based on gender differences.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Social Support and Disease Acceptance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome and Their Relationship with the Metabolic Control of the Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Sex-specific differences in blood lipids and lipid ratios in type 2 diabetic foot patients.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS/
introductionFew people have reported whether there are sex differences in blood lipids and lipid ratios in type 2 diabetic foot (T2DF) patients in China. This study attempts to identify the contribution to sex-specific differences in blood lipids and lipid ratios in these patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this case-control study, we explore 306 patients with T2DF as the study group and 306 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as the control group. Patients were diagnosed according to the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2014 (American Diabetes Association). Blood lipid and lipid ratios were determined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria.
resultsWe studied male patients with T2DF who were aged 68.00 years (18.00 years) and females who were aged 73.50 years (19.00 years); 61.76% of the patients were men. Men had higher body mass index and glycated hemoglobin levels than women. Compared with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, T2DF patients had significant differences in total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/HDL-C and apolipoprotein (apo)B/apoA-I ratios. HDL-C, triglyceride, apoA-I and apoB/apoA-I ratio showed cardiovascular disease risk in men, whereas total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apoB, and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/HDL-C and total cholesterol/HDL-C ratios were better predictors in women. The apoB/apoA-I ratio odds ratio values were 2.18 (95% confidence interval 1.17-4.41) and 2.14 (95% confidence interval 1.14-4.00) in male patients with T2DF before and after adjusting for age, respectively (P < 0.05).
conclusionsT2DF patients present sex-specific differences in their blood lipid and lipid ratios, especially in the apoB/apoA-I ratio, which could be a better indicator for cardiovascular disease risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.