Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34137369›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

A signal capture and proofreading mechanism for the KDEL-receptor explains selectivity and dynamic range in ER retrieval.

Andreas Gerondopoulos, Philipp Bräuer, Tomoaki Sobajima, Zhiyi Wu, Joanne L Parker, Philip C Biggin, Francis A Barr, Simon Newstead

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Knock-sideways by inducible ER retrieval enables a unique approach for studyingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas Gerondopoulos *Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Philipp Bräuer *Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4127-2638
Tomoaki SobajimaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0753-5361
Zhiyi WuDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7615-7851
Joanne L ParkerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Philip C BigginDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-8836
Francis A BarrDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7518-253X
Simon NewsteadDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7432-2270
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 109133/Z/15/AWellcome Trust 203741/Z/16/AWellcome Trust 219531/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ER proteins of widely differing abundance are retrieved from the Golgi by the KDEL-receptor. Abundant ER proteins tend to have KDEL rather than HDEL signals, whereas ADEL and DDEL are not used in most organisms. Here, we explore the mechanism of selective retrieval signal capture by the KDEL-receptor and how HDEL binds with 10-fold higher affinity than KDEL. Our results show the carboxyl-terminus of the retrieval signal moves along a ladder of arginine residues as it enters the binding pocket of the receptor. Gatekeeper residues D50 and E117 at the entrance of this pocket exclude ADEL and DDEL sequences. D50N/E117Q mutation of human KDEL-receptors changes the selectivity to ADEL and DDEL. However, further analysis of HDEL, KDEL, and RDEL-bound receptor structures shows that affinity differences are explained by interactions between the variable -4 H/K/R position of the signal and W120, rather than D50 or E117. Together, these findings explain KDEL-receptor selectivity, and how signal variants increase dynamic range to support efficient ER retrieval of low and high abundance proteins.

Indexed as

Receptors, PeptideEndoplasmic ReticulumGolgi ApparatusHumansMutationProtein Sorting SignalsProtein TransportKDEL receptorProtein Sorting SignalsReceptors, Peptidecargo receptorcell biologychickenendoplasmic reticulumGolgiHDELhumanKDEL

Identifiers

PMID34137369
PMCPMC8248988
OpenAlexW3171945838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.