Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34137135›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Experiences of cervical screening participation and non-participation in women from minority ethnic populations in Scotland.

Mia Nelson, Andrea Patton, Katie Robb, David Weller, Aziz Sheikh, Kalpana Ragupathy, David Morrison, Christine Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Acceptability of Self-Sampling for Cervical Screening in Ethnically Diverse Groups in Northwest England: A Focus Group Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Central and Eastern European Migrants in the United Kingdom: A Scoping Review of the Reasons for Utilisation of Transnational Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Experiences of cervical screening participation and non-participation in women from minority ethnic populations in Scotland.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mia NelsonUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-8745
Andrea PattonUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Katie RobbInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
David WellerUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kalpana RagupathyNinewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
David MorrisonInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Christine CampbellUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4868-0554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of screening in the UK and other high-income countries led to a significant decrease in the incidence of cervical cancer and increase in survival rates. Minority ethnic groups are often underrepresented in screening participation for reasons that are poorly understood.

objectiveTo explore experiences of cervical screening participation and non-participation of women from minority ethnic populations in Scotland and gain insights to support the development of interventions that could potentially support screening participation and thereby reduce inequalities.

designQualitative comparison group study using in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews that were thematically analysed. SETTING AND

participantsThis study took place in Scotland. Fifty women were purposively sampled from four ethnic minority groups: South Asian; East European; Chinese; and Black African or Caribbean. White Scottish women were also interviewed.

resultsMany experiences described were common regardless of ethnicity, such as difficulties managing competing priorities, including work and care responsibilities. However, important differences existed across the groups. These included going abroad for more frequent screening, delayed introduction to screening and not accessing primary care services, language difficulties in health-care settings despite proficiency in English and not being sexually active at screening commencement. Experiences of racism, ignorance and feeling shamed were also reported.

conclusionsKey differences exist in the experience of minority ethnic groups in Scotland. These offer potential opportunities to reduce disparity and support screening participation including maximizing co-incidental interactions and developing outreach work.

Indexed as

EthnicityUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMinority GroupsScotlandcancer screeningcervical screeningethnicitymigrant populationsminority populationsqualitative comparison groups

Identifiers

PMID34137135
PMCPMC8369098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.