ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021
Reducing pain in children with cancer at home: a feasibility study of the KLIK pain monitor app.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Community-based pediatric palliative care: a systematic review of structures, processes, and outcomes.Jornal de pediatriaPooled it
- Early Postoperative Analgesic Outcomes Following Pre-Induction Intravenous Ibuprofen in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Repair: A Randomized Controlled Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Health Technologies and Infrastructures for Supporting Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The introduction of a new mobile lifestyle tool in the battle against hypothalamic obesity; the "HAPPYthalamus" application.Obesity pillars · 2025Article
- The Role of Mobile Applications in Enhancing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Children with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Barriers and facilitators of pain management in children: a scoping review.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Digital tools for assessing chronic pain in children (5-11 years): Systematic review.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2024Article
- Supporting parent capacity to manage pain in young children with cancer at home: Co-design and usability testing of the PainCaRe app.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2024Article
- Acceptability, Effectiveness, and Roles of mHealth Applications in Supporting Cancer Pain Self-Management: Integrative Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Review
- Outlooks on using a mobile health intervention for supportive pain management for children and adolescents with cancer: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- The effect of technology-based interventions on child and parent outcomes in pediatric oncology: A systemic review of experimental evidence.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Review
- Pain Assessment Tools for Infants, Children, and Adolescents With Cancer: A Scoping Review.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study assessed adherence to, feasibility of, and barriers and facilitators of implementation of an app developed to monitor and follow-up with pain in children with cancer at home.
methodsChildren (8-18 years) receiving cancer treatment (all diagnoses) or their parents (of children aged 0-7 years) used the KLIK Pain Monitor app for 3 weeks. Pain was assessed twice daily using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11) (ranging from 0 to 10). Healthcare professionals (HCP's) from the hospital's Pediatric Pain Service were instructed to follow-up with clinically significant pain scores (≥ 4) within 120 min (scores 4-6) or 30 min (scores 7-10). Adherence, feasibility, and implementation outcomes were assessed using questionnaires, app log data, and interviews.
resultsTwenty-seven children (M age = 7.3 years, 51.8% male) and six HCP's participated. Sixty-three percent (N = 17) of families used the app on a daily basis during three weeks, and 18.5% (N = 5) reported pain scores twice daily during that time (family adherence). Twelve out of 27 children (44.4%) reported a clinically significant pain score at least once. In 70% (14/20) of clinically significant pain scores, HCP's followed-up with families within the set timeframe (HCP adherence). Outcomes reveal feasibility for the majority of app functions (i.e., positive evaluation by ≥ 70% families/HCP's), and non-feasible aspects could be resolved. Identified barriers and facilitators were used to improve future implementation efforts.
conclusionUse of the KLIK Pain Monitor app seems feasible. Future research will determine its effectiveness in reducing pain in children with cancer at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.