ArticleJSES international2021
Proximal and mid-thigh fascia lata graft constructs used for arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction show equivalent biomechanical properties: an in vitro human cadaver study.
Article in JSES international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical influence of surgical and graft-related factors in superior capsule reconstruction: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Medial collateral ligament section during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty managed by direct repair and fascia lata augmentation autograft: a case report and surgical technique.AME case reports · 2024Article
- Superior capsular reconstruction: current evidence and limits.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- Mechanical Characterization of Human Fascia Lata: Uniaxial Tensile Tests from Fresh-Frozen Cadaver Samples and Constitutive Modelling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Donor-Site Morbidity After Autologous Fascia Lata Harvest for Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Midterm Follow-up Evaluation.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears by different graft materials-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe proximal fascia lata (FL) graft construct used for arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (ASCR) is openly harvested, whereas the mid-thigh FL graft construct is minimally invasively harvested. The purpose of the current study was to compare the biomechanical properties of proximal thigh and mid-thigh-harvested FL graft constructs used for ASCR. The hypothesis was that, despite the different morphological characteristics of the proximal thigh and mid-thigh FL graft constructs used for ASCR, their biomechanical properties would not significantly differ. This information may assist orthopedic surgeons in the choice of the harvest location, technique, and type of graft construct for ASCR.
methodsForty FL specimens, 20 proximal thigh and 20 mid-thigh, were harvested from the lateral thighs of 10 fresh human cadavers (6 male, 4 female; average age, 58.60 ± 17.20 years). The thickness of each 2-layered proximal thigh and 6-layered mid-thigh FL graft construct was measured. Each construct was mechanically tested in the longitudinal direction, and the stiffness and Young's modulus were computed. Data were compared by Welch's independent t-test and analysis of variance, and statistical significance was set at
resultsThe average thickness of the proximal thigh FL graft construct (7.17 ± 1.97 mm) was significantly higher than that of the mid-thigh (5.54 ± 1.37 mm) [F (1,32) = 7.333,
conclusionDespite the different morphological characteristics of the proximal thigh and mid-thigh FL graft constructs used for ASCR, their Young's modulus and stiffness did not significantly differ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.