Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136822›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2021

Setting the Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Range for Critically Ill Patients: Is There a Floor or Even a Ceiling?

Erin F Barreto, Andrew J Webb, Gwendolyn M Pais, Andrew D Rule, Paul J Jannetto, Marc H Scheetz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam againstJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  16. Use of the DMAIC Lean Six Sigma quality improvement framework to improve beta-lactam antibiotic adequacy in the critically ill.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The OPAT opportunity for beta-lactam individualization.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin F BarretoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Andrew J WebbDepartment of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Gwendolyn M PaisDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL.
Andrew D RuleDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Paul J JannettoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Marc H ScheetzDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMidwestern University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Beta-lactam individualization for critically ill patientsK23AI143882 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BARRETO, ERIN FRAZEE · 2020 to 2024
$986k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI143882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit high interindividual variability in drug concentrations in patients with critical illness which led to an interest in the use of therapeutic drug monitoring to improve effectiveness and safety. To implement therapeutic drug monitoring, it is necessary to define the beta-lactam therapeutic range-in essence, what drug concentration would prompt a clinician to make dose adjustments up or down. This objective of this narrative review was to summarize evidence for the "floor" (for effectiveness) and "ceiling" (for toxicity) for the beta-lactam therapeutic range to be used with individualized therapeutic drug monitoring. DATA SOURCES: Research articles were sourced from PubMed using search term combinations of "pharmacokinetics," "pharmacodynamics," "toxicity," "neurotoxicity," "therapeutic drug monitoring," "beta-lactam," "cefepime," "meropenem," "piperacillin/tazobactam," "ICU," and "critical illness." STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected if they included preclinical, translational, or clinical data on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic thresholds for effectiveness and safety for beta-lactams in critical illness. DATA SYNTHESIS: Experimental data indicate a beta-lactam concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organism for greater than or equal to 40-60% of the dosing interval is needed, but clinical data indicate that higher concentrations may be preferrable. In the first 48 hours of critical illness, a free beta-lactam concentration at or above the susceptibility breakpoint of the most likely pathogen for 100% of the dosing interval would be reasonable (typically based on

conclusionsAs studies advance the understanding of beta-lactam exposure and response in critically ill patients, it is essential to clearly define the acceptable therapeutic range to guide regimen selection and adjustment.

Indexed as

adverse eventsantibioticintensive carepharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsseizures

Identifiers

PMID34136822
PMCPMC8202642
OpenAlexW3172458512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.