Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136814›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021

Modeling Healthy Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI.

Christoph Baur, Benedikt Wiestler, Mark Muehlau, Claus Zimmer, Nassir Navab, Shadi Albarqouni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christoph BaurDepartment of Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748 Garching near Munich, Germany (C.B., N.N., S.A.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (B.W., C.Z.) and Department of Neurology (M.M.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (N.N.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-5864
Benedikt WiestlerDepartment of Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748 Garching near Munich, Germany (C.B., N.N., S.A.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (B.W., C.Z.) and Department of Neurology (M.M.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (N.N.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2963-7772
Mark MuehlauDepartment of Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748 Garching near Munich, Germany (C.B., N.N., S.A.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (B.W., C.Z.) and Department of Neurology (M.M.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (N.N.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9545-2709
Claus ZimmerDepartment of Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748 Garching near Munich, Germany (C.B., N.N., S.A.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (B.W., C.Z.) and Department of Neurology (M.M.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (N.N.).
Nassir NavabDepartment of Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748 Garching near Munich, Germany (C.B., N.N., S.A.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (B.W., C.Z.) and Department of Neurology (M.M.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (N.N.).
Shadi AlbarqouniDepartment of Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748 Garching near Munich, Germany (C.B., N.N., S.A.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (B.W., C.Z.) and Department of Neurology (M.M.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (N.N.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2157-2211
TUM Klinikum · DEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop an unsupervised deep learning model on MR images of normal brain anatomy to automatically detect deviations indicative of pathologic states on abnormal MR images. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, spatial autoencoders with skip-connections (which can learn to compress and reconstruct data) were leveraged to learn the normal variability of the brain from MR scans of healthy individuals. A total of 100 normal, in-house MR scans were used for training. Subsequently, as the model was unable to reconstruct anomalies well, this characteristic was exploited for detecting and delineating various diseases by computing the difference between the input data and their reconstruction. The unsupervised model was compared with a supervised U-Net- and threshold-based classifier trained on data from 50 patients with multiple sclerosis (in-house dataset) and 50 patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive. Both the unsupervised and supervised U-Net models were tested on five different datasets containing MR images of microangiopathy, glioblastoma, and multiple sclerosis. Precision-recall statistics and derivations thereof (mean area under the precision-recall curve, Dice score) were used to quantify lesion detection and segmentation performance.

resultsThe unsupervised approach outperformed the naive thresholding approach in lesion detection (mean F1 scores ranging from 17% to 62% vs 6.4% to 15% across the five different datasets) and performed similarly to the supervised U-Net (20%-64%) across a variety of pathologic conditions. This outperformance was mostly driven by improved precision compared with the thresholding approach (mean precisions, 15%-59% vs 3.4%-10%). The model was also developed to create an anomaly heatmap display.

conclusionThe unsupervised deep learning model was able to automatically detect anomalies on brain MR images with high performance.

Identifiers

PMID34136814
PMCPMC8204131
OpenAlexW3132972512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.