Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136738›Full record

ArticleGender and the genome2018

Gender Differences in Associations Between Stress and Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Outcomes.

Jasmine L Taylor, Nour Makarem, Daichi Shimbo, Brooke Aggarwal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gender and the genome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lifestyle medicine pillars for women's heart health.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Goal-Striving Stress and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Jackson Heart Study.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2022
    Article
  19. The Person's Care Requires a Sex and Gender Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmine L TaylorTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Nour MakaremDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daichi ShimboCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Brooke AggarwalDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USTulane University · US

Funding

Psychological stress, and circadian patterns of sodium excretion and blood pressureR01HL137818 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHIMBO, DAICHI · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological stress, a subjective perception of an adverse environmental change, is a hallmark of modern society. Although psychological stress has previously been established as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), it is unclear whether stress influences cardiovascular risk differently in men versus women. Gender disparities exist in the prevalence of stress as well as in the prevalence and prognosis of CVD; therefore, associations between stress and CVD risk and mortality may vary by sex. The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence from recent and landmark studies on gender differences in the associations of stress with CVD risk factors and end points and to highlight clinical and public health implications as well as future research directions in this field. Taken together, research to date indicates that while stress is associated with poorer cardiovascular health metrics in both men and women, the influence of stress on measures of glucose regulation and dyslipidemia and on overall CVD risk may be stronger among women. However, men may be more susceptible to the influence of stress on body adiposity, blood pressure, and CVD mortality. In terms of behavioral risk factors for CVD, associations between stress and diet quantity and quality appear to be stronger among women, but the influence of stress on sedentary behaviors and sleep may be stronger among men. Given that gender disparities exist in the prevalence of overall and different types of stress (eg, financial stress, caregiving stress, and occupational stress), future studies should decipher the potential differential associations between types of stress and cardiovascular risk among men and women to identify vulnerable populations and develop targeted interventions.

Indexed as

femalegenderstressstress and depression

Identifiers

PMID34136738
PMCPMC8204799
OpenAlexW2905929201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.