Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136561›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2021

Social Capital From Professional Engineering Organizations and the Persistence of Women and Underrepresented Minority Undergraduates.

Chrystal A S Smith, Hesborn Wao, Gladis Kersaint, Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo, Phyllis Gray-Ray, Ellen Puccia, Julie P Martin, Reginald Lee, John Skvoretz, George MacDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chrystal A S SmithDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Hesborn WaoDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Gladis KersaintDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Rebecca Campbell-MontalvoDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Phyllis Gray-RayDepartment of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Ellen PucciaBeta Research Associates, Palmetto, FL, United States.
Julie P MartinDepartment of Engineering Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Reginald LeeCenter for Research, Evaluation, Assessment, Measurement, College of Education, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
John SkvoretzDepartment of Sociology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
George MacDonaldThe MacDonald Research Institute, Wesley Chapel, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional engineering organizations (PEOs) have the potential to provide women and underrepresented and minoritized (URM) students with social capital (i.e., resources gained from relationships) that aids their persistence in their engineering undergraduate programs and into the workforce. We hypothesize that women and URM students engineering students who participate in PEOs are more likely to persist in their engineering major and that PEOs contribute to their persistence by providing them access to insider information that supports their persistence. Each year for five years we administered surveys with closed- and open-ended items to examine the association between participating in PEOs and the persistence of a cohort of engineering majors from 11 diverse universities. We used logistic regression and thematic analysis to analyze the data. URM students who participated in PEOs and other engineering related activities were more likely to persist to the second year than URM students who did not (adjusted odds ratio = 2.18, CI: 1.09, 4.37). Students reported that PEOs contributed to their persistence by enabling them to network, reduce gender and race/ethnic isolation, and access professional resources. URM students should be encouraged to participate in PEOs beginning in their first year to increase their integration in their major, which we have found to increase their persistence.

Indexed as

engineering educationequityprofessional engineering organizationssocial capitalSTEM degree persistence

Identifiers

PMID34136561
PMCPMC8203332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.