Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136530›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2021

En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor-Is It the Way Forward?

Christian Daniel Fankhauser, Marian Severin Wettstein, Luca Afferi, Nico Christian Grossmann, Hugh Mostafid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian Daniel FankhauserDepartment of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Marian Severin WettsteinDepartment of Urology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca AfferiDepartment of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Nico Christian GrossmannDepartment of Urology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hugh MostafidDepartment of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) represents the cornerstone in diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer but recurrence is observed in up to 80% and over- or understaging with TURBT is common. A more recent development to overcome these limitations represents en-bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) which offers several advantages over TURBT. In this report, we briefly review studies assessing outcomes of bladder cancer patients undergoing ERBT. Most randomized and non-randomized trial demonstrate improvement in clinical outcomes for ERBT over TURBT, however more pathological and translational studies are warranted.

Indexed as

bladder cancertransurethraltrans-urethral resection of bladder tumorurothelial atypiaurothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID34136530
PMCPMC8200555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.