ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2021
Effectiveness and stability of robot-assisted anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pancreatic anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of detailed techniques.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic vs laparoscopic approaches of pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy provides better short-term outcomes as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The optimal choice for patients underwent minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a structured narrative review of learning curve, patient selection, and program readiness.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- The British technique of purely robotic Whipple's pancreatoduodenectomy a systematic and stepwise ('clockwise') approach.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Safety and learning curve analysis of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of a single surgeon.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Review
- Effect of internal jugular vein catheterization on intracranial pressure and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: which one is better?Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- A comparative study of robotics and laparoscopic in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: A single-center experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReconstruction using robotic assistance in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was expected to be an effective means to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery. To our knowledge, few comparative reports exist on the outcomes of totally laparoscopic PD (TLPD) and robot-assisted laparoscopic PD (RLPD). This retrospective study aimed to analyze the surgical results of TLPD and RLPD in a high-volume pancreatic center.
methodsWe analyzed the surgical results of consecutive patients who underwent a minimally invasive PD for malignant or benign periampullary lesions between January 2016 and May 2020. Forty-three TLPD patients and 49 RLPD patients were enrolled.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics between the 2 groups except for tumor size, which was significantly larger in the RLPD group than in the TLPD group (mean, 3.1 cm
conclusionRLPD showed the advantage of reducing the operation time compared to TLPD as well as technical feasibility and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.