Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136402›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Automatic Image Selection Model Based on Machine Learning for Endobronchial Ultrasound Strain Elastography Videos.

Xinxin Zhi, Jin Li, Junxiang Chen, Lei Wang, Fangfang Xie, Wenrui Dai, Jiayuan Sun, Hongkai Xiong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Combination ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Pulmonology.Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xinxin ZhiDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jin LiSchool of Electronic Information & Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Junxiang ChenDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Fangfang XieDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wenrui DaiSchool of Electronic Information & Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayuan SunDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hongkai XiongSchool of Electronic Information & Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Chest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EBUS) strain elastography can diagnose intrathoracic benign and malignant lymph nodes (LNs) by reflecting the relative stiffness of tissues. Due to strong subjectivity, it is difficult to give full play to the diagnostic efficiency of strain elastography. This study aims to use machine learning to automatically select high-quality and stable representative images from EBUS strain elastography videos.

methodsLNs with qualified strain elastography videos from June 2019 to November 2019 were enrolled in the training and validation sets randomly at a quantity ratio of 3:1 to train an automatic image selection model using machine learning algorithm. The strain elastography videos in December 2019 were used as the test set, from which three representative images were selected for each LN by the model. Meanwhile, three experts and three trainees selected one representative image severally for each LN on the test set. Qualitative grading score and four quantitative methods were used to evaluate images above to assess the performance of the automatic image selection model.

resultsA total of 415 LNs were included in the training and validation sets and 91 LNs in the test set. Result of the qualitative grading score showed that there was no statistical difference between the three images selected by the machine learning model. Coefficient of variation (CV) values of the four quantitative methods in the machine learning group were all lower than the corresponding CV values in the expert and trainee groups, which demonstrated great stability of the machine learning model. Diagnostic performance analysis on the four quantitative methods showed that the diagnostic accuracies were range from 70.33% to 73.63% in the trainee group, 78.02% to 83.52% in the machine learning group, and 80.22% to 82.42% in the expert group. Moreover, there were no statistical differences in corresponding mean values of the four quantitative methods between the machine learning and expert groups (p >0.05).

conclusionThe automatic image selection model established in this study can help select stable and high-quality representative images from EBUS strain elastography videos, which has great potential in the diagnosis of intrathoracic LNs.

Indexed as

endobronchial ultrasoundimage selectionlymph nodesmachine learningstrain elastography

Identifiers

PMID34136402
PMCPMC8201408
OpenAlexW3167673063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.