Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136270›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2021

Experimental evolution supports signatures of sexual selection in genomic divergence.

R Axel W Wiberg, Paris Veltsos, Rhonda R Snook, Michael G Ritchie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sexual selection purges mutation load, but not overall genetic diversity, decreasing vulnerability to extinction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Reverse genetics of sexual antagonism.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

R Axel W WibergCentre for Biological Diversity University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9TH United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-8670
Paris VeltsosDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas 66045.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-6281
Rhonda R SnookDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm 106 91 Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1852-1448
Michael G RitchieCentre for Biological Diversity University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9TH United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-8675
University of St Andrews · GBStockholm University · SEUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genomics has contributed to the growing evidence that sexual selection is an important component of evolutionary divergence and speciation. Divergence by sexual selection is implicated in faster rates of divergence of the X chromosome and of genes thought to underlie sexually selected traits, including genes that are sex biased in expression. However, accurately inferring the relative importance of complex and interacting forms of natural selection, demography, and neutral processes that occurred in the evolutionary past is challenging. Experimental evolution provides an opportunity to apply controlled treatments for multiple generations and examine the consequent genomic divergence. Here, we altered sexual selection intensity, elevating sexual selection in polyandrous lines and eliminating it in monogamous lines, and examined patterns of allele frequency divergence in the genome of

Indexed as

Drosophila pseudoobscuraexperimental evolutionFSTgenomic divergencegenomic islandssexual selectionTajima's DX chromosome divergence

Identifiers

PMID34136270
PMCPMC8190450
OpenAlexW3139010165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.