Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136106›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021

Image-driven classification of functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma by deep convolutional neural networks.

Hongyu Li, Qi Zhao, Yihua Zhang, Ke Sai, Lunshan Xu, Yonggao Mou, Yubin Xie, Jian Ren, Xiaobing Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiomics of pituitary adenoma using computer vision: a review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongyu LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Qi ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Yihua ZhangThe Department of Neurosurgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Ke SaiDepartment of Neurosurgery/Neuro-oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lunshan XuThe Department of Neurosurgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Yonggao MouDepartment of Neurosurgery/Neuro-oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yubin XieState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Jian RenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Xiaobing JiangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNArmy Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The secreting function of pituitary adenomas (PAs) plays a critical role in making the treatment strategies. However, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) analysis for pituitary adenomas is labor intensive and highly variable among radiologists. In this work, by applying convolutional neural network (CNN), we built a segmentation and classification model to help distinguish functioning pituitary adenomas from non-functioning subtypes with 3D MRI images from 185 patients with PAs (two centers). Specifically, the classification model adopts the concept of transfer learning and uses the pre-trained segmentation model to extract deep features from conventional MRI images. As a result, both segmentation and classification models obtained high performance in two internal validation datasets and an external testing dataset (for segmentation model: Dice score = 0.8188, 0.8091 and 0.8093 respectively; for classification model: AUROC = 0.8063, 0.7881 and 0.8478, respectively). In addition, the classification model considers the attention mechanism for better model interpretation. Taken together, this work provides the first deep learning-based tumor region segmentation and classification models of PAs, which enables early diagnosis and subtyping PAs from MRI images.

Indexed as

Deep learningMRIPituitary adenomas

Identifiers

PMID34136106
PMCPMC8178077
OpenAlexW3160722668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.