Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34136021›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2021

A Scoring System for Outpatient Orthopedist to Preliminarily Distinguish Spinal Metastasis from Spinal Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Analysis of 141 Patients.

Xing Du, Yuxiao She, Yunsheng Ou, Yong Zhu, Wei Luo, Dianming Jiang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imaging update in spinal tuberculosis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Value of serum tumor markers in early differential diagnosis of spinal tumors and spinal infections.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xing DuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-7847
Yuxiao SheDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Yunsheng OuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8578-3523
Yong ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Wei LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Dianming JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSpinal tuberculosis (TB) misdiagnosed of spinal metastasis was not rarely reported, especially in outpatients department. This study was aimed to establish an outpatient scoring system to preliminarily distinguish spinal metastasis from spinal TB.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive 141 patients with a pathological diagnosis of spinal metastasis (82 cases) or spinal TB (59 cases) in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2018. The following clinical characteristics which can be obtained by outpatient orthopedist were recorded and analyzed: age, gender, malignant tumor history, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and imaging features including distribution characteristics of vertebral lesions, subligamentous spread, paravertebral or psoas abscess, involved vertebral element, intervertebral disc, and sequestra formation. The prevalence of clinical characteristics in spinal metastasis was evaluated, and the scoring system was established using logistic regression analysis. The performance of the scoring system was also prospectively validated.

resultsThe outpatient scoring system was based on five clinical characteristics confirmed as significant predictors of spinal metastasis, namely, malignant tumor history, subligamentous spread, posterior element lesions, preserved discs, and no sequestra formation. Spinal metastasis showed a significant higher score than spinal TB (8.17 points

conclusionSpinal lesions with the score of 5 to 10 would be considered a diagnosis of spinal metastasis, while the score of 0 to 4 may be spinal TB. Because the scoring system is mainly based on the clinical characteristics that can be obtained by an outpatient orthopedist, it is suitable to be used as a diagnostic tool in the outpatient department.

Indexed as

AdultAgedClinical CompetenceDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic SurgeonsOutpatientsProspective StudiesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34136021
PMCPMC8179772
OpenAlexW3168094271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.