Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135995›Full record

ArticleEthique & sante2018

Bioethics education in Democratic Republic of Congo: Experiences and challenges.

S Rennie, L Ravez, D Makindu, A Fox, B Grauls, R Yemesi, P Kayembé, J L Chalachala, M Kashamuka, F Behets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethique & sante, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S RennieDepartment of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, États-Unis.
L RavezDépartement Sciences-Philosophies-Sociétés, Centre de Bioéthique de l'Université de Namur, Institut, Université de Namur, rue de Bruxelles, 61, 5000 Namur, Belgique.
D MakinduÉcole de Santé Publique, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Bioéthique pour l'Afrique Francophone (CIBAF), Université de Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo.
A FoxDépartement Sciences-Philosophies-Sociétés, Centre de Bioéthique de l'Université de Namur, Institut, Université de Namur, rue de Bruxelles, 61, 5000 Namur, Belgique.
B GraulsDépartement Sciences-Philosophies-Sociétés, Centre de Bioéthique de l'Université de Namur, Institut, Université de Namur, rue de Bruxelles, 61, 5000 Namur, Belgique.
R YemesiUniversité Pédagogique Nationale, République Démocratique du Congo.
P KayembéÉcole de Santé Publique, République Démocratique du Congo.
J L ChalachalaUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, DRC Country Representative, Family Planning Country Action Process Evaluation (FP CAPE)/Carolina Population Center, États-Unis.
M KashamukaÉcole de Santé Publique, République Démocratique du Congo.
F BehetsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, États-Unis.

Funding

Strengthening Bioethics Capacity and Justice in HealthR25TW007098 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BEHETS, FRIEDA M., RENNIE, STUART · 2004 to 2017
$3.3M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW007098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In regions marked by socio-economic turmoil, the task of teaching bioethics to health professionals and researchers can be more challenging than elsewhere. To demonstrate this, in this article we describe some of our teaching experiences in the Democratic Republic of Congo over the past decade. A first difficulty is linguistic. Anglo-Saxon language and culture largely dominates the field of bioethics, complicating teaching and education for those who do not master the language. A second obstacle is conceptual. Bioethics is often misunderstood as reflection on technological developments in medicine, which distorts its objectives and narrows its scope, particularly in resource-constrained settings. A third difficulty is cultural and political. Ethics in this setting is difficult to distinguish from common morality and the work of moralists, who comment on problems in medicine from a religious standpoint. Moreover, when interacting with communities and institutions that are strongly hierarchical, the critical stance of bioethics can give rise to resistance and rejection. These are among the array of difficulties that undoubtedly have given rise to sharp critiques of bioethics training initiatives in developing countries, where the introduction of bioethics has been depicted as a form of Western imperialism. While taking these criticisms seriously, our experiences in the field show how these seemingly insurmountable difficulties can be transformed into (more or less) manageable challenges.

Indexed as

BioethicsClinical ethicsCultural hybridizationCultureEducationHealthcareResearch ethicsScarcity

Identifiers

PMID34135995
PMCPMC8204727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.