ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021
Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Creative People More Susceptible to False Memory? Evidence for Age- and Task-Related Differences.Creativity research journal · 2026Article
- Towards a unified theory of false memory for similar episodes.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Multimodal prior knowledge determines false memory formation.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026Article
- False memories as a function of language proficiency: Differences between semantic and phonological processing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- False memories from nowhere: Humans falsely recognize words that are not attested in their vocabulary.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- How gist and association affect false memory: False recognition and gist rating norms.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Towards theoretically understanding how long-term memory semantics can support working memory performance.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025Review
- Critical lure source details are "correctly" attributed to both directly related and mediated lists.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Investigating the neural basis of schematic false memories by examining schematic and lure pattern similarity.Memory (Hove, England) · 2024Article
- Integrating word-form representations with global similarity computation in recognition memory.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Investigating the neural basis of schematic false memories by examining schematic and lure pattern similarity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Misspelled logotypes: the hidden threat to brand identity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Hippocampal activity predicts contextual misattribution of false memories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Is there a survival processing effect in metacognition?Psychological research · 2023Article
- Lay Definitions of Intelligence, Knowledge, and Memory: Inter- and Independence of Constructs.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Short-Term Phantom Recollection in 8-10-Year-Olds and Young Adults.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Dynamics of working memory process revealed by independent component analysis in an fMRI study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Within-category similarity negatively affects associative memory performance in both younger and older adults.Memory (Hove, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Anterior Temporal Lobe Does Not Modulate False Recognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of list-learning paradigms to explore false memory has revealed several critical findings about the contributions of similarity and relatedness in memory phenomena more broadly. Characterizing the nature of "similarity and relatedness" can inform researchers about factors contributing to memory distortions and about the underlying associative and semantic networks that support veridical memory. Similarity can be defined in terms of semantic properties (e.g., shared conceptual and taxonomic features), lexical/associative properties (e.g., shared connections in associative networks), or structural properties (e.g., shared orthographic or phonological features). By manipulating the type of list and its relationship to a non-studied critical item, we review the effects of these types of similarity on veridical and false memory. All forms of similarity reviewed here result in reliable error rates and the effects on veridical memory are variable. The results across a variety of paradigms and tests provide partial support for a number of theoretical explanations of false memory phenomena, but none of the theories readily account for all results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.