Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135671›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2021

Safety and effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis use in hospitalized elderly medical patients at a Saudi tertiary care center.

Ghazwa B Korayem, Omar A Alshaya, Norah S Alsubaie, Dalal A Alabdulkarim, Omar A Almohammed, Osamah M Alfayez, Majed S Al Yami

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ghazwa B KorayemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar A AlshayaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Norah S AlsubaieDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dalal A AlabdulkarimPharmaceutical Care Service, Ministry of the National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar A AlmohammedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Osamah M AlfayezDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Majed S Al YamiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAKing Saud University · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAQassim University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAppropriate prescribing of thromboprophylaxis according to guidelines' recommendations can heighten over- or underutilization risk. The study intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of appropriate/inappropriate thromboprophylaxis use among hospitalized elderly medical patients.

methodsA retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, including patients who were ≥60 years old, hospitalized for an acute medical illness that required hospitalization in a medical ward for >48 h, and received thromboprophylaxis. Against the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, the thromboprophylaxis use appropriateness was assessed.

resultsA total of 370 patients met the inclusion criteria, in 71.9% of whom thromboprophylaxis use was appropriate. The mean age of the included patients was 75 years (±9.1), and 72.4% of them were at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and almost all these patients received appropriate thromboprophylaxis. The occurrence of bleeding was significantly higher in the appropriate use group during hospitalization than the inappropriate use group (11.7% vs. 2.9%,

conclusionThe study demonstrates high prescribers' compliance with recommendations in high-risk patients. In patients at low risk for VTE, the overutilization of thromboprophylaxis did not increase their bleeding risk. This study suggests that the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in elderly patients, regardless of their VTE risk, may outweigh the risk of bleeding.

Indexed as

AppropriatenessBleedingElderlyThromboprophylaxisVenous thromboembolismVTE

Identifiers

PMID34135671
PMCPMC8180461
OpenAlexW3159221745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.