Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135650›Full record

ReviewNature and science of sleep2021

Updated Perspectives on the Management of Sleep Disorders in the Intensive Care Unit.

Georg Nilius, Matthias Richter, Maik Schroeder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature and science of sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A pilot, parallel-group, blinded, placebo-controlled, randomiseCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Sleep during and following critical illness: A narrative review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. When the night becomes a nightmare.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georg NiliusKliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Pneumology, Essen, Germany.
Matthias RichterKliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Pneumology, Essen, Germany.
Maik SchroederKliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Pneumology, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1794-2710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep disorders and circadian dysrhythmias are extremely prevalent in critically ill patients. Impaired sleep has a variety of etiologies, exhibits a wide range of negative effects and, moreover, might deteriorate the patient's prognosis. Despite a number of scientific findings and increased awareness, the importance of sleep optimization is still lower on the list of priories in the intensive care unit (ICU). The techniques of measuring and the evaluation of sleep quantity and quality are a great challenge in the ICU setting. The subjective and objective tools of sleep validation continue to suffer from deficiencies. Treatment approaches to improve the critically ill patient's sleep have focused on non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic strategies with some promising results. But pharmacological interventions alone could not provide sufficient patient benefit. Being aware and knowing of sleep problems and the beneficial effect of the necessary therapies in ICU patients requires greater acceptance. The application of available methods and the development of new methods to prevent sleep disorders in the ICU offer the potential to improve the critically ill patient's outcome.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmsICUsleep disorders

Identifiers

PMID34135650
PMCPMC8200142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.