Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135626›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2021

Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: New Terminology for a New Era.

Erika A Petersen, Michael E Schatman, Dawood Sayed, Timothy Deer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07156513 (Pulsed Epidural Radiofrequency Versus Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients With Failed Back Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07156513 nacompletednot on this map

Pulsed Epidural Radiofrequency Versus Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients With Failed Back Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorPuerta de Hierro University HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled131ConditionsPersistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Chronic Low Back Pain, Post-Laminectomy SyndromeArmsEpidural Pulsed Radiofrequency, Betamethasone (Epidural Corticosteroid Injection)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Leveraging voice biomarkers to quantify chronic pain: a rapid review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erika A PetersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-1450
Michael E SchatmanDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1019-0413
Dawood SayedDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140
Timothy DeerSpine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID34135626
PMCPMC8197591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.