ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2021
Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous nivolumab: results from the phase I/II CheckMate 8KX study.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Trial
- Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab: A Time and Motion Substudy of a Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab for Stage I HER2+ Breast Cancer (ADEPT trial).JCO oncology practice · 2025Trial
- Time and Resource Implications of Subcutaneous Daratumumab-Based versus Intravenous Isatuximab-Based Treatment Regimens for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant Ineligible.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- A Time and Motion Study Comparing Subcutaneous Pembrolizumab Versus Intravenous Pembrolizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Advances in therapy · 2025Observational
- Development and Preclinical Testing of a Rapid, High-Volume, Auto-Injector for Subcutaneous Administration with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of automatic subcutaneous injection of daratumumab via an infusion pump.International journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Practice efficiency and total cost of care with bispecifics and CAR-T in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an institutional perspective.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Description of Feelings, Perception, and Experience Before and After Switching from IV Daratumumab to the SC Form: A Mixed-Method, Cross-Sectional Survey in Multiple Myeloma Patients in Europe.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Advancing Subcutaneous Dosing Regimens for Biotherapeutics: Clinical Strategies for Expedited Market Access.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024Review
- Improved efficiency of daratumumab treatment of multiple myeloma adopting the subcutaneous route: A micro-costing analysis in three Italian hematology centers.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Administration Characteristics of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients With Multiple Myeloma at Mayo Clinic Infusion Centers.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Benefits of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous daratumumab: Perspectives from UK healthcare providers.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Drug resistance in multiple myeloma: Soldiers and weapons in the bone marrow niche.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDaratumumab (DARA) is a humanized anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and approved as monotherapy or in combination with standard of care regimens for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). DARA intravenous (IV) administration is time-consuming; availability of DARA subcutaneous (SC) is expected to reduce this burden. A time and motion survey was undertaken to elicit healthcare providers' (HCPs') understanding of the workflow and time estimates for administration of DARA IV and SC (beyond treatment time) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis web-based, prospective survey collected data from HCPs at sites that actively enrolled patients in the phase 3 COLUMBA trial, a multicenter, noninferiority study of DARA IV versus DARA SC. Data collection included time actively spent on pre-specified drug preparation and drug administration/patient care activities; active HCP and chair time were extrapolated for first and subsequent treatments.
resultsCompared with DARA IV, DARA SC reduced median total active HCP time by 63.8% (from 265.9 to 96.3 minutes) and 49.5% (from 179.2 to 90.4 minutes) for first and subsequent treatments, respectively. When extrapolated to the anticipated number of treatments per year (23 in Year 1 and 13 in Year 2, per label), estimated active HCP time per patient was reduced by 50% in Years 1 (from 70.1 to 34.8 hours) and 2 (from 38.8 to 19.6 hours) for DARA SC versus DARA IV. Estimated chair time for DARA SC was decreased by 97% versus DARA IV for first (from 456.9 to 13.3 minutes) and subsequent treatments (from 238.0 to 8.1 minutes).
conclusionThese results suggest that DARA SC is associated with less active HCP involvement during drug preparation and drug administration/patient care compared with DARA IV, potentially reducing burdens on patients and caregivers and creating efficiencies for HCPs and healthcare facilities, allowing more patients access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.