Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135482›Full record

ArticleNature plants2021

The nearly complete genome of Ginkgo biloba illuminates gymnosperm evolution.

Hailin Liu, Xiaobo Wang, Guibin Wang, Peng Cui, Shigang Wu, Cheng Ai, Nan Hu, Alun Li, Bing He, Xiujuan Shao and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
60.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chromosome-level genome assembly ofHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution and diversification of CaBMC plant biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hailin Liu *The Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China and the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4180-3673
Xiaobo Wang *Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-7404
Guibin Wang *The Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China and the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Peng Cui *Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-9992
Shigang WuGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Cheng AiGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Nan HuThe Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China and the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7032-0558
Alun LiGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-0833
Bing HeGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xiujuan ShaoGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Zhichao WuGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3006-043X
Hu FengGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-0206
Yuxiao ChangGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Desheng MuGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jing HouThe Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China and the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaogang DaiThe Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China and the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Tongming YinThe Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China and the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China. tmyin@njfu.com.cn.
Jue RuanGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China. ruanjue@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3713-3192
Fuliang CaoThe Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China and the Key Lab of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China. fuliangcaonjfu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-3243
Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNNanjing Forestry University · CNGuangxi University · CNTexas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gymnosperms are a unique lineage of plants that currently lack a high-quality reference genome due to their large genome size and high repetitive sequence content. Here, we report a nearly complete genome assembly for Ginkgo biloba with a genome size of 9.87 Gb, an N50 contig size of 1.58 Mb and an N50 scaffold size of 775 Mb. We were able to accurately annotate 27,832 protein-coding genes in total, superseding the inaccurate annotation of 41,840 genes in a previous draft genome assembly. We found that expansion of the G. biloba genome, accompanied by the notable extension of introns, was mainly caused by the insertion of long terminal repeats rather than the recent occurrence of whole-genome duplication events, in contrast to the findings of a previous report. We also identified candidate genes in the central pair, intraflagellar transport and dynein protein families that are associated with the formation of the spermatophore flagellum, which has been lost in all seed plants except ginkgo and cycads. The newly obtained Ginkgo genome provides new insights into the evolution of the gymnosperm genome.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenome, PlantCycadopsidaDNA Transposable ElementsFlowersGinkgo bilobaIntronsPhylogenyPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsTerminal Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable ElementsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34135482
OpenAlexW3170929636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.