ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021
Current Status and Issues Concerning Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device: A Single-center Study.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Following the introduction of magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), patients with CIEDs have undergone MRI scanning more frequently. As the required settings of MRI equipment for scanning patients with a CIED vary by device, a number of precautions should be taken to allow safe examinations, including the confirmation of conditions and selection of MRI modes appropriate for pacing status in individual patients. In this study, we examined the current status and issues concerning the performance of MRI examinations in patients with an MRI-conditional CIED. Method and Results We reviewed a total of 262 MRI scans. The most common site of MRI scanning was the head, followed by the spine, abdomen, and heart in order. Regarding the MRI mode, DOO was most often used, followed by OFF, AOO, and finally VOO mode, to maintain atrioventricular synchrony. Although no obvious adverse events were observed related to MRI scanning, there were several cases encountered that might have been predisposed to a significant incident or in which the patient's intrinsic pulse rates or subjective symptoms changed before and during scanning. Conclusion As MRI is a very useful diagnostic tool for cerebrovascular diseases and orthopedic disorders, the demand for MRI scanning is high when treating these areas. Although MRI scanning in patients with MR-conditional devices was performed without any adverse events, there were incidents that could have potentially led to major harm. This highlights the importance of confirming the appropriate MRI mode is being used before scanning and monitoring patients during scanning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.