Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135047›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

UTAH: Using Telemedicine to improve early medical Abortion at Home: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing face-to-face with telephone consultations for women seeking early medical abortion.

John Joseph Reynolds-Wright, John Norrie, Sharon Tracey Cameron

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04139382 (Using Telemedicine to Improve Early Medical Abortion at Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04139382 naterminatednot on this map

Using Telemedicine to Improve Early Medical Abortion at Home

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS LothianRan2020 to 2021Enrolled125ConditionsAbortion Early, Abortion in First TrimesterArmsTelephone Consultation, Face-to-Face Consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John Joseph Reynolds-WrightThe Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK jjrw@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6597-1666
John NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sharon Tracey CameronThe Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1168-2276
NHS Lothian · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly medical abortion (EMA) is a two-stage process of terminating pregnancy using oral mifepristone (a progesterone-receptor antagonist) followed usually 1-2 days later by sublingual, vaginal or buccal misoprostol (a prostaglandin analogue). There are no published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of telemedicine for EMA. Our proposed research will determine if telephone consultations for EMA (the most common method of abortion in the UK) is non-inferior to standard face-to-face consultations with regard to the efficacy of EMA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be conducted as an RCT. The recruitment target is 1222 participants.The primary outcome is success of EMA (complete abortion rate). This will be determined based on a negative low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result (2 weeks after misoprostol use) and absence of surgical intervention or diagnosis of ongoing pregnancy (within 6 weeks of misoprostol).Secondary outcomes include total time spent at a clinic appointment to receive EMA, self-reported preparedness for EMA, level of satisfaction with consultation and effective contraception uptake compared with when women attend for a face-to-face consultation.The main analysis will be a modified intention-to-treat analysis. This will include all randomised women (with a viable pregnancy) using EMA and follow-up for the main outcome. The study initiated on 13 January 2020 and is anticipated to finish in late 2021. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was given by the South East Scotland NHS Research Ethics Committee, reference: 19/SS/0111. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at clinical and academic meetings, and shared with participants via the clinic website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04139382.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedTelemedicineFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationScotlandTelephoneUtahcommunity gynaecologygynaecologypublic healthreproductive medicinetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34135047
PMCPMC8211053
OpenAlexW3169246791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.