Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135040›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Global and regional overview of the inclusion of paediatric surgery in the national health plans of 124 countries: an ecological study.

Kelsey Landrum, Cesia F Cotache-Condor, Yingling Liu, Paul Truche, Julia Robinson, Nealey Thompson, Ryann Granzin, Emmanuel Ameh, Steve Bickler, Lubna Samad and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Kelsey Landrum *Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cesia F Cotache-Condor *Department of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3401-9565
Yingling LiuDepartment of Sociology, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Paul TrucheProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julia RobinsonDepartment of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Nealey ThompsonDepartment of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Ryann GranzinDepartment of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Emmanuel AmehDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-2386-3039
Steve BicklerDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Lubna SamadDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
John MearaProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Henry E RiceGlobal Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emily R SmithGlobal Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA emily_r_smith@baylor.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-5728
Global Initiative for Children's Surgery
Baylor University · USDuke University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USIndus Hospital · PKNational Hospital Abuja · NGUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluates the priority given to surgical care for children within national health policies, strategies and plans (NHPSPs). PARTICIPANTS AND

settingWe reviewed the NHPSPs available in the WHO's Country Planning Cycle Database. Countries with NHPSPs in languages different from English, Spanish, French or Chinese were excluded. A total of 124 countries met the inclusion criteria. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We searched for child-specific and surgery-specific terms in the NHPSPs' missions, goals and strategies using three analytic approaches: (1) count of the total number of mentions, (2) count of the number of policies with no mentions and (3) count of the number of policies with five or more mentions. Outcomes were compared across WHO regional and World Bank income-level classifications.

resultsWe found that the most frequently mentioned terms were 'child*', 'infant*' and 'immuniz*'. The most frequently mentioned surgery term was 'surg*'. Overall, 45% of NHPSPs discussed surgery and 7% discussed children's surgery. The majority (93%) of countries did not mention selected essential and cost-effective children's procedures. When stratified by WHO region and World Bank income level, the West Pacific region led the inclusion of 'pediatric surgery' in national health plans, with 17% of its countries mentioning this term. Likewise, low-income countries led the inclusion of surg* and 'pediatric surgery', with 63% and 11% of countries mentioning these terms, respectively. In both stratifications, paediatric surgery only equated to less than 1% of the total terms.

conclusionThe low prevalence of children's surgical search terms in NHPSPs indicates that the influence of surgical care for this population remains low in the majority of countries. Increased awareness of children's surgical needs in national health plans might constitute a critical step to scale up surgical system in these countries.

Indexed as

Specialties, SurgicalChildFamilyHealth PlanningHealth PolicyHumansInfantPovertyhealth policypaediatricssurgery

Identifiers

PMID34135040
PMCPMC8211076
OpenAlexW3169468472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.