Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135039›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B efficacy and safety for cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Faheel Naeem, Keren Nathan, Jeffrey Chivinski, Taline Ekmekjian, Michael Libman, Sapha Barkati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How I Approach Leishmaniasis: Diagnosis and Treatment in the United States.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faheel NaeemResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Keren NathanPediatrics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Jeffrey ChivinskiMedicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8447-1464
Taline EkmekjianMedical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Michael LibmanResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sapha BarkatiResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada sapha.barkati2@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9388-855X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment of cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis (CL and ML, respectively) must be individualised as there is no universal therapeutic approach. Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is an accessible and relatively safe treatment that has been increasingly used for the treatment of CL and ML. While several descriptive studies have been published on the efficacy and safety of L-AmB, there are no interventional studies. Moreover, the findings from published studies have not yet been integrated and synthesised. Therefore, we aim to evaluate and consolidate the descriptive evidence on the efficacy and the safety of Intravenous L-AmB treatment for CL and ML in both the New and Old World. METHODS AND ANALYSES: A systematic review of all relevant study types with no restriction on date or language of publication will be conducted. Online databases including MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Scopus, Ovid and WHO databases were searched on 3 April 2020. The search included all study types that assess Intravenous L-AmB treatment for CL and ML in humans. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Study Design strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be used to determine which studies will be selected for final inclusion. The quality of included case series and case reports will be assessed using modified quality assessment tools. A narrative synthesis of the findings will be provided and the primary outcome and secondary outcome of interest, response rate and adverse events rate, respectively, and the 95% CI will be ascertained. Estimates from individual studies will be pooled using random-effects model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require formal ethical approval since no primary data will be collected. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020173440.

Indexed as

LeishmaniasisResearch DesignAmphotericin BHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAmphotericin Bliposomal amphotericin Binfectious diseases & infestationsmicrobiologyparasitologytropical medicine

Identifiers

PMID34135039
PMCPMC8211079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.